<p>If I've been getting 31-33s (raw score) on the model test in the Barrons book,(I've only taken 2 though), what range of scores should I expect on the actual test?</p>
<p>i hear from other that if u can get 50% or higher, you're in good shape</p>
<p>thats about right. 50%.. i got around 600IIC on barrons, and was about to cancel my test the week before.. but i got 770</p>
<p>I got 800's (raw ~45) on each but the first test, yet I scored a 760 on the real test.</p>
<p>Josh, that's weird how you scored lower on the actual test while using Barron's.
If I'm using Barron's and have been averaging a 650, should I expect something in the low 700's or would that be overconfident?</p>
<p>I bet you score 750+ Crazy, just go in there ready to kick some ass</p>
<p>I got like 9-12 wrong on barrons and ended up with a 800. Don't worry that much.</p>
<p>The Barron's SATII Math IIC is such an inaccurate book, its not even funny...</p>
<p>Wait... it is...</p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>HiWei is right. The Barrons practice tests are hard, so logic might go, that if you can survive Barrons you can survive the real thing. But they are not only harder, they are very much different from the test that ETS will give you. Sparknotes provides a more accurate depiction of the test, just watch out for typoes (there are lots of them!) and mistakes! Even when they explain some of their answers, their explanations contain mathematically false statements. After you finish some of Barrons tests, try two or three of Sparkotes'. (I think those tests are easier than the real one)</p>
<p>any ideas about the Barron's SAT 1? I'm getting 2060-2080. How much should I expect on the real SAT?</p>
<p>jehangircama--for SAT I Books, you should always anticipate the lowest score, beacuse there's a level of stress factor in taking the actual exam that never gets counted for.</p>
<p>How can you convert the raw score out of 50 on the Barron's practice tests to a projected score out of 800? I don't see any conversions in the book.</p>
<p>wait josh, you said that sparknotes is more accurate than barron's. how close is it to the real thing?</p>