<p>Hahahaa I used my ti-89 also. but I was just checking... just in case I did something stupid. which happens... A LOT ;)</p>
<p>Oh, yeah. I want to know the f(x+2) one also. What was the graph like again? I don't remember that question anymore.</p>
<p>i got (0, 2) for that one.</p>
<p>i think it was 4, not 2 since it shifted to the left</p>
<p>****.. i thought it was x-2</p>
<p>yeah i think it did shift to the left</p>
<p>omg. crap. two wrong, 3 missed already. i hope i get an 800.</p>
<p>Was the answer B? I don't remember the number I got though. Aahhh.</p>
<p>Oh, yeah. And the question about the inverse? What was the answer to that one? I remember it being really easy. I just want to double check.</p>
<p>it was something like (0,5) to (5, 0)</p>
<p>What did you guys get for the babysitting one? I think I got A for the answer.</p>
<p>with the inverse i just switched x and y. i thought it was too easy, but that's what i did.</p>
<p>I just switched it too. I thought it was retarded. I hope we're not wrong.</p>
<p>yea A for the answer</p>
<p>I just called a friend who took the SAT II and she said that the 113 problem was indeed 113. It read "all positive integers from 1 to 225"... so there you go!</p>
<p>i am so screwed.</p>
<p>Okay good. I got 113. Did you guys think this was harder or easier than the actual CB tests or other practice tests you took? I want to kind of predict what my score range is.</p>
<p>harder. quite harder.</p>
<p>For me this was easier than my practice tests. But I mostly used Barron's, so that's to be expected.</p>
<p>which practice tests did you think this was most comparable to? Not at all like Barron's I thought</p>