<p>Here’s the poem:
WEIGHING the stedfastness and state<br>
Of some mean things which here below reside,<br>
Where birds like watchful Clocks the noiseless date<br>
And Intercourse of times divide,<br>
Where Bees at night get home and hive, and flowrs 5
Early, aswel as late,<br>
Rise with the Sun, and set in the same bowrs; </p>
<pre><code>I would (said I) my God would give
</code></pre>
<p>The staidness of these things to man! for these<br>
To his divine appointments ever cleave, 10
And no new business breaks their peace;<br>
The birds nor sow, nor reap, yet sup and dine,<br>
The flowres without clothes live,<br>
Yet Solomon was never drest so fine. </p>
<pre><code>Man hath stil either toyes, or Care, 15
</code></pre>
<p>He hath no root, nor to one place is ty’d,<br>
But ever restless and Irregular<br>
About this Earth doth run and ride,<br>
He knows he hath a home, but scarce knows where,<br>
He sayes it is so far 20
That he hath quite forgot how to go there. </p>
<pre><code>He knocks at all doors, strays and roams,
</code></pre>
<p>Nay hath not so much wit as some stones have<br>
Which in the darkest nights point to their homes,<br>
By some hid sense their Maker gave; 25
Man is the shuttle, to whose winding quest<br>
And passage through these looms<br>
God order’d motion, but ordain’d no rest.</p>
<p>Contemptuous definitely seems like the second best answer, but it connotes intense anger that just doesn’t seem like it’s in the poem to me. The author addresses God asking him to improve man’s situation, so it seemed like he was more sympathetic of man than contemptuous.</p>