<p>@JebarPolsky</p>
<p>that is wrong because if you cancel out x^n, you have 2x^2+X left</p>
<p>About that median. There were two questions. One answer is 26 for sure. The second I just guessed. Did you do that with 101 first odd number right? For me, all answer were wrong…
And what about slope? that was hard one.</p>
<p>I am 100% sure it is 3x but to be sure, remind me of the question exactly.</p>
<p>what would a raw score of 50 yields</p>
<p>I believe that 50 raw points is about 730.</p>
<p>How does anyone know which section was the experimental section?</p>
<p>Experimental section is usually harder than other sections.</p>
<p>Thanks. 
Crossing my fingers it was the Section 3 Writing one cause I’m pretty sure I spilled some brains for that section.</p>
<p>Actually, maths section was experimental. There were 4 maths sections.</p>
<p>There are 3 different tests each with a different experimental section. Mine was writing because I got 3 and usually there’s only 2. The experimental was either section 3 or 6 - I’m hoping 6, because I did better on 3. Still hoping for an 800 on Writing.</p>
<p>Can anyone tell me why the median was 26? I put it 27. Isn’t it the middle value when ordering from increasing to decreasing?</p>
<p>Because there were 170 of number at all, so median was 85-86 number. There were 40 numbers of 25, 50 numbers of 26, etc. So 85-86 numbers were both 26. Median, therefore, was 26.</p>
<p>After I got out the test, I thought the experimental section was the CR section with the Robinson Crusoe.</p>
<p>Why? It was quite fine for me. Of course, I don’t know the answers yet, but it seemed not too difficult.</p>
<p>i definitely did not want to take this SAT. i took march and the curve murdered me 50 on math was a 720…all medium level mistakes also. took subject tests this time instead lol</p>
<p>SAT in june woo</p>
<p>Dude, in the January SAT, a 51 was a 720. <em>cries</em>
All stupid mistakes too - seriously, 2 of them are calculation mistakes, and one was just “I didn’t read the question”
Now I have 2 mistakes - first: rushing mistake, did the answer too quickly and counted wrong - and second, well I didn’t know they were referring to the median of the cars, I guess I didn’t really understand the question. Sucks. But I think this curve will be slightly more generous, the test was more difficult than the January one. Hopefully 750 for a 52.</p>
<p>@OMGMIT I had only 3 CR sections and the Robinson Crusoe one was in one of them , that was definitely not the experimental section… My experimental was definitely math… I think section 3.</p>
<p>that was supposed to be experimental. Does anyone really not remember it?</p>
<p>Vienna passage should be experimental because I didn’t have that one.</p>
<p>^you didn’t read my question did you?</p>
<p>Sorry, I didn’t read it fully.</p>