<p>@141421356 hahahaha i hope not. me teacher basically said “i didnt teach you ecology, its easy go learn it yourself” </p>
<p>i tried.</p>
<p>@141421356 hahahaha i hope not. me teacher basically said “i didnt teach you ecology, its easy go learn it yourself” </p>
<p>i tried.</p>
<p>Okay, well sensory has to do with touch feel smeel etc. But motor nuerons control the bladder, so they also control the gallbladder.</p>
<p>scuba, u in arizona?
my teacher did the same thing</p>
<p>nah, jersey
is this the part where everyone starts hating me?</p>
<p>I put sensory. But I think that it was motor because that would show that the gland was not producing the thing it needs to produce. The sensory neurons recieve the info, pass it on to the internueorns and then pass it on to motor neurons. If motor neurons were not there, the gallbladder wouldnt do its job.</p>
<p>@jellymarshmallow apparently motor neurons control the secretion of stuff</p>
<p>does anyone agree with me that the acid one could also be aerosol</p>
<p>@scuba Why cuz your from jeresy?
lol</p>
<p>Curve prediction time.</p>
<p>Oh yeah some of you guys were asking about the acid deposition question. Luckily, that was a topic I learned from self-studying AP Environmental Science hehe. Anyway, I put burning fossil fuels as the answer because fossil fuels produce sulfur oxides, which combine with water molecules to form what we call “acid rain”.</p>
<p>Question: How the heck was the plant undergoing photosynthesis. There was no carbon dioxide right? So the light dependent part wont work. So thats where the major of the enzymes are right? </p>
<p>Maybe rubsico just works better, but my question is where is this CO2 that rubsico can grab? Cuz if its not there, there really no enzymes to speak of except some sort of reductase in light dependent.</p>
<p>“The primary pollutants associated with acid rain and poor visibility are human-made sulfur dioxide emissions. These emisisons form small sulfate particles, or aerosols, in the atmosphere. These aerosols reduce visibility by scattering light.”</p>
<p>human-made sulfur dioxide emissions AKA =Fossil fuels. </p>
<p>The question was like what human activity (i think) affects it. They probably meant aerosol cans. </p>
<p>But the problem is that was vague and both have valid points</p>
<p>I thought aerosol cans produced more CFCs than sulfur oxides.</p>
<p>^ They do. IF the question was worded better that would have been more clear.</p>
<p>I guess the discussion is dying down.</p>
<p>hmm i think the question said something about humans. i hope the curve is around -5 for 800. what do you think that a -7 will be. 770?</p>
<p>^ probably. I hope its more though. Really awesome curve would be
-6 800
-7 790
-8 790
-9 770
-10 770 </p>
<p>THAT is NEVER going to happen though</p>
<p>What you guys think a -10 will be? Should I Cancel?</p>
<p>i really hope the curve is that good, but i dont think it will be.</p>
<p>thought it was pretty easy
though for the photosynthesis: i thought it would be the enzyme since ETC proteins dont work under high temp</p>
<p>when do we find out what the curve is? and when do we find out the scores??</p>
<p>how are you guy studying for the ap monday??</p>
<p>Better estimate
Raw Score Scaled Score
80 800<br>
79 800<br>
78 800
77 800
76 790
75 780
74 770
73 770
72 760
71 760
70 750
69 740
68 740</p>