<p>what would a raw score of 50 in math yield</p>
<p>ummm…wrong post…but around 700-730?</p>
<p>sorryyyy :P</p>
<p>were the two authors for the lying passage in complete agreement?</p>
<p>Yes, they were in complete agreement…
CR Consolidated List</p>
<h2>36/67</h2>
<p>Sentence Completions</p>
<h2>12/19</h2>
<p>ostensibly(not salient)
squalid(not cataclysmic)
tycoon/philanthropist
succinctly
archeaologist
ferocity/contentious (not accuracy/inexact)
fanciful/exploit(about children’s books being inaccurate)
reticent(timid employees)
nourishment
captivated
commonplace/startling
nominal</p>
<hr>
<p>Passage Based Questions</p>
<h2>24/48</h2>
<p>1) chimpanzees
2) physics string theory</p>
<h2>3) stolen diamond w/ lawyer and butler</h2>
<p>2)author of passage 2 would be in complete agreement
3)butler was deferential at lawyer
prudent (mom going to college with daughter)
typical answer(daughter’s italics remarks)
3)‘want’ means lack of
2)superhuman computer represents lack of technology to use it as a tool
2)passage 2 would say that the mathematicians and physicians should pursue different avenues
3)“as soon as he turned his back” showed his eagerness
3)the quote from robert crusoe represented an omen
3)growing sense of alarm(in lawyer)/moment of perplexity
3)Only repeated meant brevity of interval
1)look in chimpanzee’s eye/raising of hand shows relation between empathy and technology
3)cost means personal toll
1)chimpanzees were cracking nuts
3)puffery was self-regard and exaggeration
lying passage - qualification
welsh passage - her nationality wasn’t her most important characteristic
3)innocent people were defamed
2)passage 1 says reason string theory is hard to prove is because of complexity of mathematics
2)fits and starts was sudden bursts
2)scope and outcome
(frida kahlo) playing a role allows you to express your inner feelings more
2)Authors agree that in its current state the string theory is incomplete
(frida kahlo) towards the end of her life she started wearing more to hide her growing frailty
(frida kahlo) mask and frame question? (two different personalities or sides)(contradicting purposes)</p>
<hr>
<hr>
<p>question that has heasay as an answer</p>
<p>identity, fragile health types of questions from flamboyant style woman passage</p>
<p>Love>language>technology… why didn’t she think technology was the major difference…? her thoughts about love questions from chimpanzee/autobiography passage</p>
<p>String theory passage - the relationship between the two passages, lack of knowledge… etc</p>
<p>Stolen diamond passage - omen, uniquenss, </p>
<p>We NEED TO EXPAND ON THIS LIST SO THAT WE HAVE BETTER EXPECTATIONS OF WHAT WE WILL GET! ANYTHING!</p>
<p>""Stolen diamond passage - omen, uniquenss, “”</p>
<p>what do you mean ‘uniquenss’</p>
<p>yes…we definitely need to expand on this…
sentence completion there was about someone taking _______ approach, physics, maths,etc…that i think was INTERDISCIPLINARY</p>
<p>passages…
chimpanzee…there was a question about internal compass…i chose the difference is “one is sophisticated understanding, other is less sophisticated”…something like that…but i think m wrong…anyone?</p>
<p>Which sentence had nominal as the answer? I don’t remember seeing nominal at all.</p>
<p>CR Consolidated List</p>
<h2>45/67</h2>
<p>Sentence Completions</p>
<h2>13/19</h2>
<p>ostensibly(not salient)
squalid(not cataclysmic)
tycoon/philanthropist
ludicrously
archeaologist
ferocity/contentious (not accuracy/inexact)
fanciful/exploit(about children’s books being inaccurate)
reticent(timid employees)
nourishment
captivated
commonplace/startling
nominal
cleanliness
plagiarize</p>
<hr>
<p>Passage Based Questions</p>
<h2>32/48</h2>
<p>Short passages:
1)lying passage
2)welsh passage (first woman from Great Britain to become a composer)</p>
<h2>3)Mother not telling her daughter she is going to college</h2>
<p>1)Lying passage - qualification
2)her nationality wasn’t her most important characteristic
3)Mother - prudent in not telling her daugher</p>
<h2>3)Mother - the litalicized lines were a typical/likely response from daughter</h2>
<hr>
<p>Long passages:
- chimpanzees + (frida Kahlo - flamboyant woman with withering health)
- physics string theory</p>
<h2>3) stolen diamond w/ lawyer and butler</h2>
<p>1)look in chimpanzee’s eye/raising of hand shows relation between empathy and technology
1)factory - cooperationg in a productive activity
1)chimpanzees were cracking nuts
1)supposed means counterintuitive to people
1)her response was a witty repartee
(frida kahlo) towards the end of her life she started wearing more to hide her growing frailty
(frida kahlo) playing a role allows you to express your inner feelings more
(frida kahlo) mask and frame question? (two different personalities or sides)(contradicting purposes)
(frida Kahlo) her increasing jewelry or w/e counterbalances her weak health.
2)author of passage 2 would be in complete agreement
2)Authors agree that in its current state the string theory is incomplete
2)superhuman computer represents lack of technology to use it as a tool
2)passage 2 would say that the mathematicians and physicians should pursue different avenues
2)passage 1 says reason string theory is hard to prove is because of complexity of mathematics
2)fits and starts was whim, because it said something like zigzag.
2)scope and outcome
2) humans are overshadowed by technology
2) draw means infer
3)innocent people were defamed
3)‘want’ means lack of
3)“as soon as he turned his back” showed his eagerness
3)the quote from robert crusoe represented an omen
3)growing sense of alarm(in lawyer)/moment of perplexity
3)Only repeated meant brevity of interval/uniqueness of events
3)cost means personal toll
3)puffery was self-regard and exaggeration
3)butler was deferential at lawyer
3)Lawyer determined the true feeling</p>
<p>Why was it a factory?
Why was it nursery?
what language does - gather up small advancements something like that…
what does the woman think we should learn from the zees? (I think it was the last question)</p>
<p>Guys lets keep trying to remember what was on the test! WE’re nearly there!</p>
<p>For one of the questions about chimpanzees, the question was along the lines of " What is the purpose of language?"</p>
<p>I put it gathers "small,individual accomplishments into large, collective ones. Is this right?</p>
<p>I think something like that noncensure! but I’m sure I saw advancement in the sentence…</p>
<p>Oh yeah, I forgot even I did.</p>
<p>For the mother-daughter passage, what were the other choices for the “prudent” question? and was this question number 18 or something? and was “prudent” choice (B)?</p>
<p>(because I can’t remember what I put for this one, and I remember fidgeting around question 18)… thanks!!</p>
<p>why would it be growing alarm? what was he alarmed about? it clearly said he was following the guys story, but had yet to see his role in it yet. that is definitely momentary perplexity</p>
<p>True that, momentary perplexity.
Also, some others feel wrong. I’m no vocab whiz but are you sure the first 4 (minus ostensibly) are correct? Ludicrously… tycoon…?
Oh and any chance the “factory” question was “highly regimented life”? I hated that question. Couldn’t figure out if it was regimented life or productive collaboration.</p>
<p>wait, since when did we change succinctly into ludicrously?</p>
<p>True that, momentary perplexity.
Also, some others feel wrong. I’m no vocab whiz but are you sure the first 4 (minus ostensibly) are correct? Ludicrously… tycoon…?
Oh and any chance the “factory” question was “highly regimented life”? I hated that question. Couldn’t figure out if it was regimented life or productive collaboration.</p>
<p>it’s definitely succinctly because (as people said before) it discussed about the economy of … (here, economy means frugality, not wasteful management).</p>
<p>Yes Im still pretty sure its succintly and not ludicrously. Also the one with the plagerize, why wasnt it contradict, because I believe thats what I put.</p>
<p>@duermomucho: I think I remember nominal being one with two blanks, but I’m not positive. I don’t remember the question, sorry.</p>