<p>Digression is an art form, and I am its Picasso.</p>
<p>Yes, I do consider evolution vs creation an intelligent post. It is much better than reading about the consumption of dog food.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Don't worry, UCLA! I understand that I greatly out debated you in the God and evolution threads. Losing is no fun!
[/quote]
</p>
<p>If, by "out debated," you mean completely ignored facts, reasoning, and the weight of one of the largest bodies of scientific discovery in the history of modern science, then call me out for losing.</p>
<p>Otherwise, there there.</p>
<p>
[quote]
THIS is fun to read?!?! To read about someone catagorizing their dog food and then perhaps eating it? Dear Lord! Foolishness is what this is.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Sorry, but sometimes it's the absurd things that are funny. I have to say that I got a bit of a chuckle out of her anorexic dog, myself.</p>
<p>
[quote]
THIS is fun to read?!?! To read about someone catagorizing their dog food and then perhaps eating it? Dear Lord! Foolishness is what this is.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I could imagine hearing this with a British accent.</p>
<p>A really stuffy one.</p>
<p>Ooh, that could be a Monty Python sketch...</p>
<p>UCLAri: Oh, well excuse me! Your posts were nothing more than pure speculation sprinkled with links from no name scientists. Boy, I sure got out debated!</p>
<p>No name scientists like Francis Futuyma, Niles Elridge, and Stephen J. Gould?</p>
<p>Oh yeah, real nobodies. Kinda like Feynman to Physics and Boyer to Chemistry. No names.</p>
<p>Boy, Justinian I, you sure talk sophisticatededededly! </p>
<p>If you think this post is so stupid, then why are you here? Byebye now. Run along.</p>
<p>Didn't Gould write Ever Since Darwin? Or am I mixing up my people again...</p>
<p>
[quote]
Boy, Justinian I, you sure talk sophisticatededededly!
[/quote]
</p>
<p>And yet he can't spell "charade" correctly.</p>
<p>If you're going to use somewhat big words, at least spell them correctly...</p>
<p>
[quote]
Didn't Gould write Ever Since Darwin? Or am I mixing up my people again...
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Well, he more "put it together" than "wrote" it. I mean, it was a collection of his writings in other media. But yes, he was the author.</p>
<p>UCLA:</p>
<pre><code>Or Newton, Maxwell, Mendel, Lister, Pasteur, Faraday, Kelvin, Ramsay, Linnaeus, Davy, and Cuvier. These are REAl no bodies, eh? These Christian scientists just quoted are nothing compared to yours.
</code></pre>
<p>yes, they are no bodies. their heads float about, devoid of neck or torso.</p>
<p>Justinian,</p>
<p>What do any of them have to do with the topic at hand? As far as I know, none of them really had much to say about evolution, anyway.</p>
<p>Besides, do you want to really be listing Mendel, when his work in genetics was one of the key first steps in understanding how evolution and genetic drift work?</p>
<p>Darwin was a Christian.</p>
<p>So was Lemaitre, who some consider "The Father of the Big Bang theory." Well, him or Hubble. I think Hubble was Christian, too.</p>
<p>"in understand how evolution and genetic drift work?"</p>
<p>"Mendell"</p>
<p>And yet he can neither write a coherent sentence nor can spell the name of the founding father of genetics.</p>
<p>If you are going to argue with me, use correct spelling and grammar!</p>
<p>[You know your life is pathetic when you are arguing with someone you don't know, over a subject that doesn't matter, and have resorted to "his argument is pointless because he can't spell cat"]</p>
<p>Continue on... this is entertaining</p>
<p>Justinian,</p>
<p>First off, fixed my post.</p>
<p>How funny that it was you who originally added the extra l to "Mendel," yet you're using it as ammo against me.</p>
<p>Anyway, I'd like to hear you actually explain how your list of scientists somehow invalidates the work of Nobel Prize winners and other key figures in evolutionary biology. Please, explain.</p>