<p>I got “demarcation between readers who can think critically” also.</p>
<p>Hmm, looks like I’m safe on that one then. Just hope my erasure marks don’t get mistaken as filling in two answer choices.</p>
<p>For the question that asked about refuting the author’s claim, was the answer “the skills needed to understand children’s programs differ from adult program skills?”</p>
<p>What I meant for hubris is, as a sentence completion answer, if it went with the japanese girls(experimental choice 1) or the black historian cr section(experimental choice 2)</p>
<p>@Toasti i put that!</p>
<p>Nonono Harvard, the implication is actually created from the fact that the passage only talked about her sisters only stopping at a certain extent in their reading, while the author took it to the next level.</p>
<p>Harvard, I thought it was the author valued reading more than her sisters did because the passage said that her sisters were bored when it rained, while she read books. I didn’t think it implied that she always accepts what she reads, just that she enjoys it.</p>
<p>SECOND VERSION NOV. TEST. BLUE COVER</p>
<p>COMPILATION:</p>
<p>SC:
hubris
seminal
intransigent
given to…platitude
antithetical…adulatory
embezzlement question: complicity in
maya angelou: versatile</p>
<p>Passages:</p>
<p>-rainy day reading: author used words playfully
-author valued reading more than her sisters did</p>
<p>-characterization of Maria: extremely naive
-The primary focus of the passage -Changed perception
-what does it mean by ocean-She sees herself losing something that is irrreplaceable
-why does Maria mention the times- to articulate a meaningful point across
-Tsunagi’s tone when she talks to maria-indigant rebuke
-maria feels something for Tsunagi-she finally understands tsunagi
-previous thought of tsunagi: never exprienced loss.
-losing smth and gaining smth is central for exchange/change
-tsunagi has vulnerability</p>
<p>-mantle=appearance
-special techiniques of forger are attributes
-historian had “admiration and disdain” for forger
-historian was detective
-forger had great ability and productivity
-other forgers were caught for following the masterpieces too closely</p>
<p>-fifth, seventh, and ninth grade ==> different experience
-hard to deny TV to children
-“literature attitude”=the ability to think critically about what you read/skepticism
-countering the author’s point: skills needed to understand programs geared towards children are different from the skills needed for adult
-barrier between children and adult: demarcation between readers who can think critically</p>
<p>-environmentalist activism motivated by anger
-first environmental passage “accepting a trend”</p>
<p>Are you sure that “changed the course of art history” was incorrect? And what was the question for "special techniques of forger are attributes?</p>
<p>I think I got all of the passage questions right 
:D</p>
<p>Got a couple of SCs wrong though 
still gunning for an 800.</p>
<p>Combine, I’m sure that “changed the course of art history” is wrong. Although it could be inferred the ability/productivity answer was much more straightforward.</p>
<p>K, can you answer my second question though. What was the question for the special techniques of forgers b/c I don’t remember it at all.</p>
<p>It was something to do with the snake bands on the sculpture. I don’t remember well either. It was asking whether the bands were an “attribute” or “impression” of the style.</p>
<p>That one was tough. I remember the passage talked about the snake bands, and then about the impression the snake bands created. It was hard to determine whether the question was referring the actual presence of the snake bands or the general feeling that the snake bands contributed to. </p>
<p>Ultimately I figured they meant the snake bands themselves, and went with the attribute answer.</p>
<p>For some reason I can’t remember that question at all. Now I’m getting paranoid that I might have skipped it, or at the time I thought the answer was obvious so it didn’t stick in my mind. Can anyone else remember the question verbatim with the answer choices?</p>
<p>“-countering the author’s point: skills needed to understand programs geared towards children are different from the skills needed for adult”</p>
<p>Can someone explain this one to me? I put A, I think, the one with the TV shows geared specifically towards children. Because wasn’t the question about proving wrong the author’s point about there being no “children’s programming”? So wouldn’t TV shows for children be exactly children’s programming and thus prove them wrong?</p>
<p>Also, was the section with the two short pieces on pleasure and happiness (which I thought were really hard) and the word “loquacity” as an answer for sentence completion experimental?</p>
<p>ETA: And I got ability/productivity. I’m almost entirely certain that’s right.</p>
<p>His argument has nothing to do with how the programs are “officially” designated; he says that there is no “children’s” programming because the skills that anyone uses to watch TV are the same.</p>
<p>For best word to replace “honest”, did you get frank?</p>
<p>Yeah…none of the others really made sense.</p>
<p>does anyone remember putting salubrious,exurbarent and benevolent?</p>
<p>I remember those choices, but I don’t think they were right… what were the questions?</p>