November 2008 SAT Subject Test: Math Level 2

Test Preparation SAT Subject Test Preparation
501

<p>regarding the factorials one, i thought it was x>=3 because you can divide and simplify?
no?</p>

502

<p>Have we reached consensus on the rotated solid volume? Was it 1500pi or 2000pi?</p>

503

<p>3! = 3 * 2 * 1...that's not even divisible by 9 unless you get a fraction, which isn't what they mean.</p>

504

<p>What would 7 omit, 7 wrong get you?</p>

505

<p>I hope I'm not screwed...
I panicked and omitted 9, but from the looks of it I have no missed any of the consolidated ones.</p>

506

<p>the answer is >=6! for sure.
6!=6<em>5</em>4<em>3</em>2<em>1=18</em>5<em>4</em>2=9<em>2</em>2<em>5</em>4</p>

507

<p>so if u skipped 4 and missed 4, is there no chance for a 780??</p>

508

<p>i think i skippped none and got 4-5 wrong
and the funny thing is that i wasent even using a graphing calculator. i used a scientific calculator.</p>

509

<p>that's a raw score of 41.
it'll be 770 unless it has a really generous curve</p>

510

<p>and does that refer to me anhtimmy?</p>

511

<p>If you omit 4, how many can you get wrong and still get an 800?</p>

512

<p>anhtimmy was referring to BigWeight. plbrar, your raw score is 44-45, which should give you an 800, but it's very borderline.</p>

513

<p>1500pi!!!!!</p>

514

<p>Are you sure? My friend says 1500pi would result from a rotation about the y-axis, but the problem was about the x-axis?</p>

515

<p>@#$%$E@$#%
was it on the x-axis for sure?</p>

516

<p>I'm almost sure it said the y axis.</p>

517

<p>I thought it was about the XY side of the triangle, which is the side that has a measure of 20. That means 20 is the height and 25 is the radius, which would give an answer of 1500pi.</p>

<p>but guys, if you omit 4, how many can you get wrong and still get an 800?
(if the curve is not that generous)</p>

518

<p>sorry, the radius is 15*, not 25.</p>

519

<p>@ Pynne, that's what I think, too. I was actively looking out for this, but my friend and some CC posters are convinced it was 2000pi...anyone wanna clear this up definitively?</p>

<p>Oh, and if you omitted 4, you can probably get 2 wrong and have an 800.</p>

520

<p>crap i really do hope it was the y-axis.
who here says the question say x-axis/y-axis??</p>