November 2009 SAT Math (US only)

<p>@187: that proof is predicated on the assumption that you have those equations right. But I’m now getting more and more convinced that I’m wrong and you’re right; why would TCB take a question that’s difficult and then make it easier? It just wouldn’t make sense.</p>

<p>OMGOSH I GOT B.10 i hope im right sorry ■■■■■.</p>

<p>Joshtch: Those two equations are right. About 5 people have confirmed this on this thread already.</p>

<p>Well, drat. -1 for me. :(</p>

<p>Yes Rawk, I got 302 for the sequence question. </p>

<p>For the last grid-in, did you get 1.2?</p>

<p>Didn’t you get the dog question wrong josh?
In which case, -2 :p</p>

<p>No, I had 12 for the answer. Still -1. :/</p>

<p>Well, at least you got a hard-ish question wrong.
I still can’t believe I couldn’t count 2 prime numbers.</p>

<p>i had 4 math sections and i am wondering if the section with 995 as the greatest prime number thing less than 1000 was EXPERIMENTAL. CAN ANYONE HELP ME PLZ??</p>

<p>toasti i heard it is, i got it wrong though do you remmeber anything else?</p>

<p>the question about subtracting the first n consecutive odd integers and the first n consecutive even integers was so badly worded…what the hell did they mean?</p>

<p>did you get 900 for the loads?</p>

<p>Was one of the grid-ins .833?</p>

<p>For the area of the square one I remember it was m^2+p^2. And the function graph was y=|x^2-4| or something. And the line that passes through (2,4) but not (0,0) was x+y=6.</p>

<p>Yeah, I remember getting 900 for something, and 8040 too.</p>

<p>There was a problem that stated 0<m<p.
p^2 + m had the greatest value.</p>

<p>@Jshapiro105
Yes. 5/6…</p>

<p>

I got 997…</p>

<p>I don’t appreciate that ellipsis, n00bman!</p>

<p>toasti do yo remember anything else?</p>

<p>t/m must be greater than one. That’s it, sorry. :c </p>

<p>Also, they’re asking for “prime totality,” so 9+9+7=25, not prime. 9+9+5=23, which is closest.</p>