<p>There was a cone question… I just don’t think the answer posted earlier was for that question</p>
<p>I think the answer to the cone problem was 252pi</p>
<p>Last question of the test (with the is) was 5, that I can contribute lol.</p>
<p>Ugh, so I’ve definitely skipped three and missed two so far (the calculator finding zeroes of the graph I, II, II one and the term ratio being -3 one…eff that last one) Anyone know the answer to the question about which choice doesn’t result in a vertical asymptote?</p>
<p>I think I put 2 for that one. Or -2.</p>
<p>For that one you just had to make the function have a hole.</p>
<p>hm, anyone remember what the cone question was asking? …</p>
<p>Do people think it’ll be -7 curve? </p>
<p>And randomazn, the answer to the last question wasn’t 5… it was B?</p>
<p>^Wait, like, choice B? Do you remember the answer itself?</p>
<p>-2 + i i think</p>
<p>I got choice B for the last one and 2 for the no asymptote because it was like x+k and it had to be x+2 for there to be a discontinuity i believe that was choice D</p>
<p>wait so what was the question for the vertical asymtote?</p>
<p>and what did people get for the n+2 and n-2 question?
wasnt it 23?</p>
<p>it cant be 15 cause 15 isnt a prime.</p>
<p>& the f=g</p>
<p>1 is the only thing that works cause for 3. f-g( f=x^2 and g=2x-2)</p>
<p>X^2-2x+2 and the intersection between the two are completely different. </p>
<p>thoughts???</p>
<p>^ the prime # problem said something like this
“which one of the following is a counterexample to this statement: if n+2 and n-2 are both prime numbers, then n is a prime number”</p>
<p>15+2 = 17
15-2= 13
both 17 and 13 are prime numbers. but 15 is not, so this would disprove the statement.</p>
<p>and the f=g…idk which question you’re talking about so i can’t help you with that :/</p>
<p>f=x^2 and g=2x-2 don’t intersect. Change g(x) to g=2x+2 </p>
<p>The intersections of f=x^2 and g=2x+2 are at x= -.73205 and at x= 2.73205</p>
<p>Then graph X^2 - 2x -2</p>
<p>The zeros are the same as the intersections above, so both I and III of that question worked.</p>
<p>so what is the answer for the similar triangles?</p>
<p>anyone remember what the cone question was asking? :/</p>
<p>Ughh… so noone has the whole list of answers from 1 - 50?
That is so stressful cuz I’m sooo curious!!</p>
<p>For exponential regression problem the answer is 21 weeks ,and i’m pretty sure about it.</p>
<p>For box and whisker plot, I got 75%…not sure about that.</p>
<p>I was confused between 75% and 90% for the boxplot for its length was definitely more than 50%. it wasnt 90% too. So i put 75%. </p>
<p>I dont know how to do it. I just measured the length lol</p>
<p>No, it was definitely 50%. Boxplots aren’t measured by length.</p>
<p>Sooo what is the agreed answer for the similair triangles?</p>