<p>Like anything with music, it depends on the student in terms of approaches, there aren’t any hard and fast rules, which of course makes it a royal pain in the tookus to be a music parent at times:). </p>
<p>Middle school is sort of a pivot in terms of what kids do with music, it is the time (especially on strings and piano) where it seems decisions need to be made, given the nature of what has happened in music in the past 30 years, the level of competition, the level of playing, all have gone through the roof. Here are some of my thoughts, in no particular order:</p>
<p>-One of the biggest things I think is to encourage listening to music, whether it is on I tunes, online, radio, whatever, and especially going to live performances. Seeing it played live is different then a recording, and it also is a way to share with the student. As my son’s knowledge of music grew, it allowed him to share his enthusiasm with us, to be able to talk about what was going on, what he thought of the performer, etc.</p>
<p>-Teacher in all this is critical, and not all teachers are the same. Especially once the student gets serious, it is important to try and find the right teacher, whether it is because the student has outgrown their old teacher, or because the new teacher knows more about the level of playing out there, knows people in the programs who will be taking in music students, and has their ear to the ground. It isn’t easy to tell with this, it is a combination of asking others, doing research, and in some cases, luck. One of my S’s prior teachers was a pretty high level musician, in a pretty high level orchestra, yet it turned out when my S moved to a different teacher how much they didn’t teach, let get through, with basic technique and such, and also, how little they knew what music was like today (his old teacher told him that it was okay to be casual about it through high school, then get serious in college, which on violin is deadly advice). I used to wonder why people drive kids 5, 6,7 hours or fly them into to top level prep programs, now I can understand it (though it may not take that, finding a great teacher is important).</p>
<p>-With practicing, it is a tightrope, forcing kids to practice can end up with the kid resenting it and doing little, being too hands off the kid could slouch. I think the big thing with practice is however much the student does it, that they have consistent time when they practice, that it is part of the schedule…some kids of course set their own time,practice when they want to, and it works, but my experience is that they have some dfinition to it, including how long they practice in a stretch (my S found 20-25 minute chunks worked for him, made the several hours a day work easier, plus helped him not overtire his arms and hands). I read a story about Donald Weilerstein, himself a high caliber violinist and teacher, with his daughter, Alyssa, who is now one of the top cello soloists aroudnd, and with her, using reverse psychology, where he told her “only practice 20 minutes, no more”…and being a typical kid, practiced a lot more, saying “you can’t tell me how much to practice” <em>lol</em> (whether true or not, it is funny…). </p>
<p>-Over time, it should be less and less parent. In the early phases, Suzuki violin emphasizes the parental involvement, sitting with them practicing, etc…but over time, it has to be more and more the student. I saw parents who sat in on the lessons of 17 and 18 year olds, recording the lesson, etc, and to me that is ridiculous…over time, I think our role moves from being a ‘pusher’ to being providers/support…by the time our S hit his late middle school years, we simply helped him make the decisions, he did it, and when he hit the high school years, it really was only about incidental stuff, like instruments, getting him places, etc…he decided where to audition, with his teacher the rep he played, we simply made sure to get him where he needed to go, make sure it all worked, gave him opinions during the post audition process, but let him make the decisions…it in some ways isn’t any different then how we parent as the kid grows up, as they get older, they make more and more decisions</p>
<p>-Get them involved with as much ensemble work as possible, as early as possible, kids usually enjoy this. School programs are ok, but if there are youth orchestras or chamber programs, go for it. Likewise, when they hit upper middle school, if they feel they are ready for it, a challenging prep program like SF conservatory, NEC, Juilliard, CIM and others have is not a bad thing. </p>
<p>One of the reasons for this is these programs will often have top level musicians in them, and the kid will be able to measure themselves, see where they lie, and make decisions based on that. Speaking from experience, when our S moved from a local youth orchestra to one that is tough to get into, he saw the difference, same with prep programs. The big fish in a small sea can get overwhelmed when they see what is out there, and it is good to know where you are with things, what you need to strive towards. </p>
<p>-Same with summer programs, while they are by no means mandatory, they can give a taste of what is out there, since many of them draw top level students. Interlochen, Kinhaven, Meadowmount, etc (I am naming these simply as examples, not saying go to any of these) have a wide variety of students, but you will see students at all levels and can help assess where you are.It doesn’t have to be a big name program, there are a lot of them, and it can really help. </p>
<p>-Even if you think your teacher is topnotch, it never hurts, especially in high school, to get an independant evaluation from another teacher, maybe someone who teaches at a high level program, to benchmark where you are, and get a critical eye on things.</p>
<p>-If your kid gets serious, you might face serious conflict with school programs, this is common. If they are practicing x hours a day, and going to school, taking courses, homework, time is going to be limited, and if they are good, you often will have school music directors ‘latching onto’ them and so forth, for pit band, stage bands, orchestras, etc…and if you have to give up things, personally I would recommend the school program be the lowest priority. Yeah, I am aware of the social aspects, I played in school programs for many years, had fun, but I also have seen the conflict, not just with my own kid, but other people as well. I understand where the music directors are coming from but they often forget that with music kids, there are conflicts, and that being in the school program can be detrimental. I know it sounds cold, but ultimately, our view has to be with the best interests of our kids. if the kid can do it, fine, but if there is something that needs to give, I would drop this…same with all state/region/etc, if the kid is doing other programs that are high level, those may not be beneficial (the key with all this, it depends…if All State is all that is available, then go for it)…</p>
<p>-Be prepared at times to deal with emotional storms, like “I don’t want to do this any more, it is too hard, ti is stupid”…with our S, we always told him he could stop at any time, all we asked is to finish out whatever cycle he was in, to the next recital, whatever. In part, to allow them to cool down, and see what happens. Our S had a hard time with vibrato, getting it right, and was frustrated, angry, etc…and at one point, was really down, it happens.</p>
<p>-There is also a fine line between being realistic and being negative, it isn’t easy. I think as parents we dance that line, I have seen a lot of parents who say “Music? There is no living in that” or “that is a hobby” or “a good EC to get you into a good college”, and while i understand the feeling, it is as misguided as “Of course you should go into music, you are so good, you’ll be fantastic, become a soloist, etc” (and yes, I have heard/seen that one…_). Maybe I am a bit of an oddball these days, but my take was we were realistic with him,plus he also met a lot of working musicians who knew the deal out there, and what we told him was if that is his passion go for it…but if something else seemed intriguing, he might want to put that into the mix, or even do that. We encouraged him to think about 'what if music doesn’t work out" but also showed him confidence we had in him that he was smart enough, that if music fell through, he could handle it, we weren’t neutral (for example, if he didn’t show the passion he did, I would have been discouraging him all over the place, if he didn’t internalize practicing and so forth), but we also wanted to support his dreams. I think part of this was influenced by the story of Leonard Bernstein, whose father refused to support his son’s musical ambitions, which left Bernstein to fend for himself, and years later, when someone asked why, the father said “Who knew he would turn into Leonard Bernstein?”…with the point being, very little is guaranteed in this world, and people who think an academic degree from the Ivy league guarantees much are as deluded as those who think getting into Juilliard will guarantee success in music by its name alone…:). I think we need to be realistic but encouraging, unless everything we see says the kid may be deluding themself…but then, instead of saying “you aren’t good enough”, you find ways to show the kid the reality, and let him come to his/her own enlightenment.</p>
<p>The above are nuts and bolts, it probably can be summed up by enthusiasm, encouragement and support bounded by reason…easy to say, hard to do:)</p>