<p>We never positioned or pushed our son, we introduced the instrument, and he ran with it. Wife and I have no formal music training or talents, but music was always available and enjoyed. </p>
<p>Son was always the smallest and youngest of his class peers, mentally/scholastically on a par or a bit head, but physically lacking small motor skills and coordination. Our public system suggested he try a string instrument as a means of improving small motor skills. From the day he picked it up he fell in love. He would practice religiously, and our concern was that he not overpractice, causing him potential long or short term physical damage. </p>
<p>He progressed very quickly, and was soon the best within his local peer/school group. With our limited backgrounds his lessons were confined to school, a six week/once a week lesson set during summers with his public school instructor, and a weekly lesson at a local retail music store offering lessons.</p>
<p>Throughout middle school, our excellent public system afforded him some opportunities to play in some Music in the Parks type events, and they won numerous group trophies, which had their effect. He also had other interests, among them boy scouts and some limited organized baseball. He did not want to participate in youth symphony, because of the conflict with boy scouts. We let him choose, and he chose scouts. In eight grade he changed direction. Something kicked in. It became all music, all the time. He wanted youth symphony, he wanted the seperate chamber ensemble activity. He wanted "a better teacher". </p>
<p>Again, within our limited experience, we gave him the best opportunities we were aware of within our local area and within our financial means. What drove and enabled him was his own ability, a fantastic and dedicated set of music ed pros from grade through high school, a high quality youth symphony with a group of amazingly talented peers. This commanlity of shared interest,
a very cooperative mutual respect and healthy but not cuthroat competition within his peer group was prime in his development. </p>
<p>To paraphrase Michael Corleone, we were stupid, he was lucky. We never even knew enough of what we were doing to even assume it was the "best" way or the "right" way.</p>
<p>Through the YS we developed a network of peer parents, and began to make better connections: a high level ensemble coach/mentor and at her suggestion, a change of teachers. His relationship with his mentor allowed for and put him in a position to regularly play with conservatory students, grads, and active and retired pros, which only drove him to push himself more, to hit that next level.</p>
<p>I've asked him honestly if our lack of knowledge had positioned him poorly for undergrad, and I must assume his "No" an honest one.</p>
<p>As a parent, the best advice I can give is recognize the Muse. Provide the support you can, and arm yourself with knowledge. Establish the financial parameters that you can provide. Beyond that, impose no limits, but do not define their goals.</p>
<p>The rest is up to your kid, and the Muse. </p>
<p>They determine the equation, and the outcome</p>