I would like to present some more facts/perspectives.
This country didn’t really allow Asians to immigrate till 1965. So yes, Asians couldn’t easily get a visa to come to the USA some 50 years back, and yes that would count as racism.
When Asians started to come en masse after that, slowly becoming the number one source of new immigrants to the USA (even more so than Hispanics) first they were treated with quite a bit of hostility. When my brother was here in the 70s, people would stop him in the street and tell him to go back to his country. When I came in the 80s, the immigration officer at JFK looked at my visa papers and said that the country shouldn’t be giving academic scholarships to Asians when there are so many qualified Americans around. I have been in this country for nearly 30 years now, and I have faced all kinds of racism because of the color of my skin, though I must say it is rapidly dropping off. That could be because racism against Asian Americans are dropping, or it could be that my economic situation is improving in a way that shields me from racism in the street. I honestly don’t know.
The more sophisticated racism that I now encounter is the anti Asian American parenting style. I live in one of the most liberal parts of the country. Even here parents ask me in school events whether I make my son work ungodly hours as they hear all Asian parents do, whether advanced math is really that advanced, or if it is, whether it is actually worth anything, and whether my son actually wants to do the ECs that he does. The ECs would half fit the Asian stereotype, and half wouldn’t, but the question is always directed at the ones that would.
I have a thick skin and I ignore it all, but it is racism, pure and simple. I am not claiming victimhood, as I have succeeded regardless, but I find is dismaying when people claim that there is no racism in the USA against Asian Americans any more. I hope no one here will try to negate my experience here and say that I was not subject to racism. (Think about it - would you do it to an African American, a Hispanic, or a Jew?)
As for Harvard, it could be that Harvard does have a quota by profile (academic interests, ECs) and not by race but which produces the same results as Asians are self-selecting into certain profiles. However, then Harvard has no need to know the race of a student, so there should be no harm is passing a law (ala the UCs) that make considering race a federal offense in college applications. Will people who claim that it is the profile and not the race be aligned with this? I am genuinely curious.
As for the NYC SHS, one great point that was made is that public schools have a responsibility to serve the public at large and not just kids who do well in an exam. This, however, is an argument that can be extended to say that exam schools are always bad, and also that a public university system like say the UCs cannot have one group of kids in one UC vs another where the difference is academic or other performance. It should just conduct a random lottery. I personally believe in entrance exams, but I would like to see what other people think.
That said, I firmly, firmly believe that every single kid would get a chance to be well prepared for the exam. However, I also believe there does exist such public preparation centers free to all kids, but they are overwhelmingly used by Asian Americans. This leads to the old saying that you can lead the thirsty to the water but you cannot force them to drink in a capitalist society. They may just want a double-sized cup of soda instead, regardless of what Mayor Bloomberg wants them to do. As for private training centers, and how there are many of them in the Asian American neighborhoods but few in the other neighborhoods, this is how capitalism works. Businesses open up where there is demand, and not where there is no felt need but only untapped potential. It’s not an evidence of racism.
In general, different kids will always get different levels of preparation, given parental resources and commitment. The reality of living in a capitalist country is that people who can afford to get extra preparation will do so. It can come in the form of better test prep or a personal trainer in the gym or Botox injections for beauty. The only way to level the playing field there is to make everyone equal in terms of income, which is not realistic in the USA. Further, even within the same income band, parents who prioritize academics over other pursuits and expenses will have better academically prepared kids (which, of course, is trivially true).
This is a personal choice. There is no point decrying this. When someone is good at sports, do we ask whether they trained at home, or whether they have a personal trainer? No, we just accept that they could afford to have a personal trainer and were disciplined enough to work with the trainer. It could be because of their own initiative, or pressure from someone else important to them. Regardless, they are good in sports and win trophies. We do not handicap them based on their economic situation, their effort or their support system, and take trophies away from them. And before anyone points out that education changes lives and sports doesn’t, let’s talk professional athletes. We don’t penalize Andre Agassi (half Asian American) because his dad started training him for tennis at the age of 18 months.
But what about the kids with high potential who are falling through the cracks? This is ultimately, I believe, the topic that deserves careful focus. The main problem that I see in the US school system is locally funded schools. This leads to resource gaps and in turn sub-optimal schools. But will Americans at large be willing to transfer property taxes to poor neighborhoods to bring all schools at par? I would be very interested in knowing the answer to this question as well, and I think local school votes indicate that the answer would be a resounding no. Also, regardless of investment in public schools, the Asian American experience shows that education is really done at home. If the home environment is not encouraging investments in the school system will make some impact, but not a lot, and certainly not at scale. If we are not willing to change the culture at home to be more academically focused, then I posit that Asian Americans (and others like them who prioritize academics above all) will always have an academic advantage, prep or no prep.
So, given all of this, how can we ensure than all kids get an equal chance to attend an exam school? We can’t force them to study, they wouldn’t show up in the free coaching centers, and we are by and large not willing to take money away from our own school to give to the poor schools. Since we can’t pull them up, then we must pull others down. We can require that kids who work hard will no longer be allowed to, as that puts them at an advantage over kids who don’t. We can lower the cutoff such that anyone can pass that without having to work hard. Or, simply, since we are really not talking about all kids who are diamonds in the rough here, but only about URM kids, we can have race based quotas.
Now there’s an idea! Of course, we can’t ban preparation, and lowering the standard just defeats the point of having a high quality school. So, what do politicians do? They want to install race based quotas in public schools. As for private schools, they won’t say it openly, but odds are they impose race based quotas as well.
Is that racist or progressive? I don’t know, and it depends on your politics. I do wish though that people would simply come out and say that, that the only way to have a racially representative student body is to have race-based quotas, given that different races approach education with different mindsets and with different financial resources. Then we can discuss whether it is right or wrong.