<p>now
What question is 3rad 2 from?</p>
<p>I think the distance from T to line l was experimental.</p>
<p>i thought it was VERY ambiguous, i still put 4 tho</p>
<p>ughhh still cant believe I missed that 666 one</p>
<p>I didnt get that freeking PROBLEM. It was *<strong><em>ING me off, I had 3 mins before the DAMN teacher called for FREEKING time. That question was *</em></strong>ing me off, I didnt make no damn sense. That whole section was ****ing me OFF.</p>
<p>Is it possible for a 44-45 raw score in math to be at least a 660? Or will the curve be harsher?</p>
<p>the line question with answer 4 or 5 was not experimental</p>
<p>for the millionth time, What question is 3rad 2 from</p>
<p>I don’t remember the line question and I had experimental writing. What was it?</p>
<p>No, answer to surface area was d) 62x^2.</p>
<p>for the 10 millionth time, What question is 3rad 2 from?</p>
<p>@1294739. Hey dude. you sure that is the answer man. I multipled those #(s) and got some 30-something x^2 number as the answer. It was 36 X ^2 i THINK.</p>
<p>Yea, people why would it not start at (0,0)? It makes no sense that a tree with zero diameter (x-axis) can be 20 years old (y-axis)!!</p>
<p>EDIT: sorry I meant to quote the first post on pg. 20 of thread</p>
<p>bmsa91, that’s volume, not surface area.
wholegraiin… i think that’s the wrong answer to the two right triangle question with answer sqrt(3)</p>
<p>It’s 62x^2 for certain, the side lengths were 2x, 3x, and 5x.
Now, whats the line question?</p>
<p>iwishiwas1337, we were told to find the trend line.</p>
<p>thanks lap, thats what i was thinking also</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure that there was a question about surface area and another question about volume that weren’t experimental. Also, the scatter plot question was stupid.</p>
<p>WOW. I can’t believe myself. I put 667. I got the 333 and subtracted it from 1000. I knew I would make one stupid mistake and not get an 800 in math…</p>
<p>Which one was experimental?
I know I didn’t have experimental writing or CR, and I had 10 sections, so it must be math.
Was it the one with the circles and one radius was half the other radius or something?</p>