<p>yep i got that too for the graph
if you plugged in large values of x its easier to see which works</p>
<p>How did you guys solve the unwrapped chocolate problem?
I got 50 but I’m wrong? The answer is 0?
Please explain with detail. This problem is bugging me.</p>
<p>the distance from T to line L is experimental?</p>
<p>so you’ve got 100 pieces of candy.</p>
<p>70 of them are chocolate and aren’t wrapped</p>
<p>20 of them are strawberry and are wrapped (could be any flavor)</p>
<p>10 are vanilla non wrapped (or whatever flavor)</p>
<p>Are the conditions of the question satisfied? yes. how many wrapped chocolate? Zero.</p>
<p>for the question that included a double bar graph with girls/boys,
was the answer 4?
i think it asked something like how many had the amount of girls at least 50% greater than the boys…
…or was that in the experimental section? i’m pretty sure i had an extra math section.</p>
<p>i think i had experimental math also so idk if its experimental but i had that question
i think it was D also</p>
<p>sunfire, thank you!</p>
<p>wat d u guys think is a -8 raw score a 46/54</p>
<p>-8 would be about 670-680.</p>
<p>What about a -10 and omit of about 5?</p>
<p>Hey, do you guys happen to remember what’s “I” in the prime number question(multiple choice one)?</p>
<p>What are we thinking -1, -2, and -3 are this time?</p>
<p>780, 770, 760?</p>
<p>im thinking 800,770,760</p>
<p>It will never be 800. Too many people would get it. remember the SAT is based on a normal distribution.</p>
<p>Did anybody pay attention to one of the last questions on the last section? I don’t even know if it was the experimental math section. There was a tiangle prism and the question said that you find the volume of the prism as " … times the area of the base multipied by the height" (the quote might not be literal). My point is that it did not say how many times the area of the base multiplied by the height of the prism. Something must have been missing in the question. What do you think? I did answer the question… as long as I can remember it was 200sqrt3…</p>
<p>yes that was a question and it wasnt experimental. u got the answer right 200rad3</p>
<p>for the prime number question, i think I was
a + b is a prime
17 + 19 = 36 definitely not a prime</p>
<p>ya it was something like that</p>
<p>17 + 19</p>
<p>17 * 19</p>
<p>17^2 and 19^2 being consecutive primes</p>
<p>the answer was “NONE”</p>
<p>is one of the grid-in answers 196? anyone got that? 97+99</p>
<p>yes .</p>