<p>it didn’t specifically say archeological evidence. It said he drew upon knowledge of certain things to support his most reasonable source being Homer’s work. IDK if that makes sense</p>
<p>So why would smart people be offended if they were appreciated the fraud?</p>
<p>I put Kael herself, because it said the fraud depressed her.</p>
<p>And it was homer! It clearly states that he reasoned out of homer’s own findings.</p>
<p>The archaelogical was a PROBABLE answer. But not the best.</p>
<p>yes…</p>
<p>can other people confirm that the basset hound was experimental? i cant remember it at all</p>
<p>It was definitely Homer…the passage said that the author (Thycoles?) believed only in the accounts of Homer and based his entire resume on Homer’s works.</p>
<p>Sorry i think i got oscar wilde mixed together with someone who had a similar name. What was refering to was the question in the critics passage that had soemthing to do with piano</p>
<p>I never had a basset hound one…so I’m guessing yes. I think I got a math exp.</p>
<p>so yea.</p>
<p>Basset hound was definately experimental, as I had experimental math</p>
<p>IT is to my knowledge that there are multiple experimental sections for CR.</p>
<p>theimpatientone: it said kael liked fraud if it elicited a response from her that she appreciated? something like that. i likened it to having a guilty pleasure TV show that you always watch</p>
<p>so “discerning moviegoers” would be the right answer because yes, they know the sound of music is pure fluff, but they enjoy the experience because it is fun/enjoyable, and there is nothing wrong with having fun or enjoying yourself</p>
<p>
…No it didn’t.</p>
<p>Basset hound was experimental.</p>
<p>Was it ebullience or eminence?</p>
<p>^ haha, beat to it :P</p>
<p>it said who would be offended, didn’t it?</p>
<p>under which case the answer would be…no one</p>
<p>Pretty sure the author clearly stated “probably did not” in the conclusion.</p>
<p>@ l0rdie, we answered that one in the previous posts :P</p>
<p>thycoles relied on archaeological evidence. the block quote in the passage was about the information he gleamed from the evidence. i.e. wall building</p>
<p>passage also said that thy***** also looked at archeological evidence, can’t remember what i put</p>
<p>boston: the very first thing to be mentioned about thucydides was that his works were developed OUT OF HOMER. that would make homer the basis for his entire work, and therefore the most important contributing factor.</p>