<p>for New Zealand I put “when” was the error because it would make the second part of the sentence (an independent clause) a dependent clause. Therefore, the answer should have been “that”.</p>
<p>“had finished presenting”</p>
<p>If anyone remembers how exactly “had been” was used in the New Zealand question we could prolly figure out the answer. Still, I’m pretty sure “when” is the incorrect part.</p>
<p>It was though new zealand had fostered music for decades,_____ I thought for decades meant it was still happening</p>
<p>Everyone on the test had different sections, but is the order of the questions the same for everyone, or is it scrambled up?</p>
<p>@albbymur
The order is the same for all.</p>
<p>moreover or by comparison?</p>
<p>i think moreover. ty nikanon</p>
<p>is there an identify error that should be “in recognition of” instead of “in recognition to” so it should be A?</p>
<p>Is it me, Or was the writing section extremely easy? And this ismcoming from someone who got a 570 last sat writing</p>
<p>@Applelover
i thought writing was relatively easy.
CR was hard.
Math was…eh…too many careless mistakes</p>
<p>the New Zealand one was “it was only after the 1980’s that it became popular”, so <strong>when</strong> was the grammatically incorrect choice</p>
<p>hey everyone seemed to have missed the air conditioning question I asked before! :(</p>
<p>I originally chose E because I couldn’t see any glaring errors but later switched it to D after seeing that I had 4 E’s (usually are 2-3 E’s).</p>
<p>The reasoning was that covering the roof with the heat-reflecting plants wouldn’t necessarily reduce the cost of air conditioning. It should have been use of air conditioning.</p>
<p>Agree or no? I just went with the gut feeling that there was something wrong with that…</p>
<p>@krndandaman
disagree. i think you’re overthinking it.</p>
<p>does anyone remember the chichua one: the whole sentence.</p>
<p>And I got four no errors also.</p>
<p>Mine were the airconditioning, human and fish, the honey bee, and the last last question 29: than do WAS CORRECT???</p>
<p>Was the New Zealand one no error? </p>
<p>I had 5. </p>
<p>New Zealand, Honey as a helpful tool or whatever, the second one in the passage, The Fish, and the one that had “nowhere else”</p>
<p>In the section where you had to correct the essay, did you change “convinced by” to “persuaded by” or leave as is?</p>
<p>does anyone remember one question that went “wanting to improve(?) her fluency in the language”?? she committed studying…?? it was the first question in identifying errors… i put no error for this and i know it is wrong )=</p>
<p>Are you guys discussing the international exam ?</p>
<p>nowherelse is a double negative??? or something like that: shouldnt it be anywhereelse.</p>
<p>@panmit; I got four, as well. Or three. I remember counting 18 questions and then doing math with the 1/5 E rule (which isn’t true, but hey…) and thinking, “Wait a second.” But I just went with it.</p>