<p>So which one was experimental and which one was the real deal?</p>
<p>I got three no errors.</p>
<p>So which one was experimental and which one was the real deal?</p>
<p>I got three no errors.</p>
<p>I got three No Errors as well, I remember one was about ants and another about drums/another instrument. </p>
<p>I also remember putting a sentence after sentence 9.</p>
<p>(As it is) for the passage. That meant the sentence remained “For example, batteries blah blah.”</p>
<p>I remember “mouth” had to be “mouths” regarding monkeys/orangutangs.</p>
<p>One question, what was the one at the end, where the sentence was about air conditioning? Is it “were the air condition to be…” or “if the air conditioner would be…”</p>
<p>It had an “as” in it so it had to have a second “as” to be parallel.
As it is is correct. Mouths is the correct answer.
You had to remove a sentence.</p>
<p>I got 3 no errors as well, about evenly spaced throughout the questions.</p>
<p>Cool, thanks for the responses.</p>
<p>I agree with the “as” parallelism, the mouths, and ants being no error. I don’t remember the answers to removing/adding.</p>
<p>^Can u elaborate on the ants question? I don’t remember it.</p>
<p>it was about ants of certain species</p>
<p>was whoopi goldberg question e?</p>
<p>i remember the money mouth problem. that was no error i think?? cuz i got stuck on mouth vs mouths for a while but would u say “they git hit in the head” or “they got hit in the heads”???</p>
<p>You need a possessive pronoun I think. It makes sense when you use words that change form in plural. For example, you would say that “the kids hurt their feet” not “hurt their foot”</p>
<p>@Oscarlany</p>
<p>That is funny; the exact reasoning, and example feet vs. foot, went through my head on that question.</p>
<p>I got 3 NE: the drum one, the ants one, and something else.
Whoopi Goldberg was E.</p>
<p>Did anyone get one with pollutants?</p>
<p>I also got E for whoopie goldberg one but wasn’t C the only one that was parallel because it had “for”? I didn’t pick c because it had the word being in it.</p>
<p>I dont remember which answer whoopi was , but it was the one that completed the correlative contrsuction ( or parallel structure) of " She was known NOT SO MUCH FOR …AS FOR…</p>
<p>ANd, the correct answer to that other one was the one that started with “Were they to…”</p>
<p>They have asked both of these questions multiple times!</p>
<p>Who remembers the one that was like “sleep is a state that people spend one-third of their lives.” The error was “that” correct? It should be in which?</p>
<p>Refresh my memory on those? Also, do you guys remember in the identifying errors putting a adjective that should have been an adverb?</p>
<p>10 I remember and I agree. 11 I don’t remember. Can you answer my question about the sleep one? Was that wrong in “sleep is a state that people spend?” It should be “in which” correct?</p>
<p>Wasn’t that experimental?</p>
<p>I’m a bit lost. What do you guys mean by “experimental”? Were there new kinds of questions?</p>
<p>for air-conditioning problem, I put If the airconditioner would be blahblah because the following sentence’s verb after a comma was “would have” or sth which is conditional tense. Therefore IF should be included</p>
<p>^ I think I put “if the air conditioner” as well.</p>