<p>It think I remember putting 12,9</p>
<p>I remember when calculating that, I looked for when ay=bx and found one of them to be:
ay=36
bx=36</p>
<p>YEAH that was it. (12,9) because 12<em>3=36 and 9</em>4=36 so that was the correct choice. Thanks for ringing a bell, May2013SAT!</p>
<p>Okay that’s what I thought (for the trig problem). I plugged in all the choices into the function but I always got an answer. Then I graphed it on my calculator and found asymptotes near there so I just guessed E. Thank goodness.</p>
<p>Alright thank GranTurismo</p>
<p>The function was actually y=2/(3sinx + 2), not 2/(3sinx+1), but you still get that answer (3.87? Or something) Nice guessing! :)</p>
<p>No problem Matthew5! To get 750+ you need a Raw score of 39+, so maybe skip 11 and rest correct or something else.</p>
<p>Wow, really? I guess I got kinda lucky, haha.</p>
<p>When finding the side when given the 3:2 ratio for two triangles, what was the other number that you’re given?</p>
<p>Guys…I gave my math level 2 today. (Oct 5, 2013) I just decided to google this question I didn’t get, and stumbled upon this thread. I can’t believe it! My test seems to have all your questions! I didn’t know College Board repeated entire tests - is this fair? It probably doesn’t make a difference…
Sorry to awake such an old thread - but can someone answer my question? What was the scaling of this test eventually like? Was it a ‘tougher’ paper than usual?
If I made left 2 and got 4 wrong, I’m out of the running for 800? That would suck :(</p>
<p>I think it was 9…</p>
<p>Hey @Hiking7610 
this IS two years later, sorry…but can you please tell me what the math 2 subject sat curve had been that time?</p>
<p>They gave you 9 and you use the ratio to find the side in the other triangle to be 6 and then from there you use law of sin or cosine. Don’t remember. I knew what to do but I didn’t remember my laws exactly… and the one with 2/3sinx +2 if it was asking for a vertical asymptope you just set the bottom equal to zero and equal to zero, move stuff to the other side and use inverse sine…</p>
<p>google doc?</p>
<p>Wasnt the height for the painters room 8??</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the dimensions of the painter room. Let’s put this to rest. I know height was 8 and the other two were bigger.</p>
<p>Height was 8, the other two dimensions were 15 and 18.</p>
<p>Thanks. Then it is 798. I just didn’t remember the exact answer.</p>
<p>I didn’t know college board repeated tests! Is this fair? It probably may not make a difference I guess…
Speaking of fair, guess what? There was a school function happening at my test centre (St Michaels, New Delhi) with loudspeaker and music - it created helluva racket. I tried to ignore the noise by talking to myself. I hope it didn’t impact my score : (</p>
<p>Btw guys, how do you think the curve for this test would go? Would it be a ‘tough’ test?
I think I made 4 mistakes and omitted 2, am I out of the running for 800? That would suck…I guess I shouldn’t be on the borderline anyway. But aw man
PS the exponential regression question was 24 weeks</p>
<p>Missing 4 and omitting 2 might put you just below 800 normally. If you get a lucky curve it’d be 800.</p>
<p>what is missing 7 and omitting 4… 750or 730?</p>