October 22 2011 ACT Math Discush

<p>Did any of you write down the ?'s or something b/c it’s incredible how u remembered the ?'s and the choice u picked. Please be honest. It’s anonymous anyway lol</p>

<p>Can someone answer: Was the triangle supposed to be around the circle, or was the circle supposed to be around the triangle? (For the question with the triangle with coords 0,0 8,0 and 0,6)</p>

<p>@contradiction - no lol. I’ve been on this forum all day talking about the test. When you think about it hard enough, a lot of the answers come back to you, especially for difficult questions.</p>

<p>@Gameraddict - I’m not sure but I got 4,3 and so did a lot of people</p>

<p>Yeah :confused: it was 4,3 if the circle was around the triangle, and it was 2,1.5 if the triangle was around the circle… I put 2,1.5 cause I didn’t understand their wording. Crap -_-</p>

<p>chances of a -2 ->> 35 curve?</p>

<p>who knows, I didn’t think it was too bad but some of my friends who haven’t taken trig yet thought it was impossible. If -2 -> 35 that would be great.</p>

<p>Wait no that’s not what i mean bc someone said for a certain# they remembered the answer was B so i’m just wondering thanx for answering though lol</p>

<p>Yeah… I missed 5, so I’m hoping for a -2 → 35 curve so that I will still score in the low to mid 30s. Then I’ll be guaranteed a 33-34 comp :)</p>

<p>I would be hoping for a 33/34 comp but the science section totally screwed me over…</p>

<p>im predicting 30/31 english, 34-35 math, 30-31 reading, 34-36 science. praying for that 33 composite</p>

<p>uh theres like never a curve for math… usually 1 wrong is always 35 and then just goes down</p>

<p>in the red book the first test is -2 → 35, and i think there is even one with -2 36… maybe not likely but theres a chance</p>

<p>I haven’t taken geometry since 8th grade, couldn’t remember the eclipse equation -__- Other than that, I think it was rather reasonable.</p>

<p>It was irrational for the record</p>

<p>audi if x was irrational then the f(x) would be irrational. The question was asking what would make f(x) rational…</p>

<p>so the answer was rational? (crossed fingers)</p>

<p>rational, irrational, rational. </p>

<p>Just assume that this point could go either way and move on.</p>

<p>yea, think so. not 100% on that one though</p>

<p>Oh screw me in the crapper, I saw that both (2/3) and (1/3) were solutions immediately and put irrational, not thinking in terms of rationality, but rather in terms of repeating decimals -__- That’s -2 so far :P</p>

<p>I could have sworn the absolute value question had an unknown inside of the absolute value parenthesis. Dangit.</p>