<p>hey, check out this thread! i was looking up the meaning of undivined, if there was any dictionary definition- same test, by the looks of it</p>
<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-subject-tests-preparation/425987-december-2007-literature-5.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-subject-tests-preparation/425987-december-2007-literature-5.html</a></p>
<p>wow, that’s crazy.</p>
<p>I put the same for the except questions you guys mentioned. I didn’t think they were that difficult, but the test as a whole has some tricky parts. I scored pretty well on the AP Lang exam and the SAT CR and I usually get good grades of the lit practice MC’s we do in class, but i’m really not sure about this one…</p>
<p>EDIT: ^ Holy crap.. its the same one lol</p>
<p>oh wow. i definitely got a lot more wrong than i suspected. lol what would around 10 wrong be?</p>
<p>O_O</p>
<p>Okay…so this is why they didn’t want us to discuss questions and answers. I personally feel this thread and the Dec 2007 thread should be deleted–there are too many chances for exploitation.</p>
<p>i just realized. the last lit test (before this one) that was administered by Collegeboard was also the same as another official test that was done. do they just recycle tests? weird.</p>
<p>LOL THEY TOOK THE SAME TEST!!!</p>
<p>LOL! I can’t believe it. I told myself to read the past threads but I was too lazy…and when I did it for the past Physics/Chemistry tests only a few questions overlapped. But an ENTIRE TEST?!?</p>
<p>About a 760 I think.. I’m guessing thats about how well I did. Thats -10 raw points by the way. If you guessed and got ten wrong thats -12.5 raw points, which is like 730-740.</p>
<p>I’m so surprised. Collegeboard, be less lazy. We’re paying you enough. >_<</p>
<p>What if somebody took Dec 2007, then retook it again today? Geez. What the heck. </p>
<p>Maybe it was a misprint :X</p>
<p>I see that Princeton Review believes the Lit curve to be</p>
<p>56-61 = 800
55 = 790
53, 54 = 780
Anything below, -10 for every point lower.</p>
<p>Isn’t that a bit too lenient? >_>;;</p>
<p>Poisonous, the curve is that generous?</p>
<p>THAT IS FLIPPING RIDIIICULOUS</p>
<p>has this ever happened befoer?</p>
<p>yeah that’s terrible… but i’m pretty sure the one in June was also a test that was administered before that date. so everyone was just as shocked lol</p>
<p>Literature </p>
<p>61 to 56 = 800
55 = 790
54 & 53 = 780
52 = 770
51 = 760
50 = 750
49 = 740
48 = 730
47 = 720
46 = 710
45 & 44 = 700
43 = 690
42 = 680
41 = 670
40 = 660
39 = 650</p>
<p>I got it off the internet, but I presume its from the blue book originally.</p>
<p>nice lol thanks</p>
<p>Yea, it gives me hope.</p>
<p>Criminal
-personal (wrong?)
-flirtatious
-rationalization
-previous knowledge in jewelery
-doesn’t hate rich people .. so what was the answer</p>
<p>Indian Marriage
-both didn’t listen to elder man
-jasmine in hair symbolized who she would become
-self serving
-larger context </p>
<p>Fields of golden hay
-wheat harvested and left on ground
-fairy tale
-change is inevitable
-shadows of wind- how they moved with the invisible something something
-imaginary future (for the fair day)</p>
<p>Man + woman in countryside
-country v. city
-“dear man” from woman’s prospective
-wont give up horse- show his country side/ wont give up long time companion
-woman wanted courtly society
-show how man feels</p>
<p>Woman who owns store (Louisa + Guy)
-confided and free
-peculiar and special
-uptight about personal space
-NOT appalled/impatient (debated)
-fairy web shows shes so organized or something
-onlooker
-lace showed whatever
-Louisa: personal and idiosyncratic for work style and behavior</p>
<p>Prosody
-I + III, but others say I + II + III
-camillias tells you that she thinks herself is old
-comparison of man to weather
-what you expect. Vs. reality</p>
<p>books:
-dragons teeth?
-viles means distillation of intellect
-books can have human characteristics
-main point was to more carefully censor books</p>
<p>how many questions are we missing</p>
<p>about 25 lol</p>
<p>heh im a junior and this was the only test i took…come what may, doesnt matter too much…</p>
<p>We’re missing the undivine question or w/e, I remember it because I got it wrong. Also, is the support for the previous knowledge of jewelry absolute? I remember debating that question with myself, but I ultimatley went with another answer because he could only describe the jewelry as “a string of beads” and roughly estimate its worth. I can’t remember the one I picked though.</p>
<p>Also, I went with the raining one instead of “how they moved the invisible” for the shadow of the wind. It seemed to me that the poem was describing a large rain storm in a historically dry area that caused unprecedented growth of the wheat, which was then harvested and left in the field to be moved. I could be wrong though, but i took it from environmental science lol. The “rain shadow” effect is usually associated with wind, which is what made me think of it.</p>
<p>Also, we’re missing some from the woman in court/male narrative. It looks like we don’t have the one on the remarks about each other or w/e. And I notice some missing from the prosody, but I can’t place them right now.</p>
<p>im pretty sure undivined means revealed in that context…some eloquent explanation of that is lost somehwere in this thread. i also think the jewelry option isnt right, anyone can estimate the value of something, whereas its explicit that he is new to the arena of crime…im a little unsure about the Joe’s POV one, seems to me it could go either way…</p>