<p>"Think you've heard it all about out-of-touch academics? Here are some new courses that you don't see at most schools, from the politically charged to fun classes about pop culture." Philosophy of Star Trek? Radical Thought from Karl Marx to George Bush? ...</p>
<p>I don’t see what’s wacky about Radical Thought from Karl Marx to George Bush (other than the argument over whether Bush actually is radical, I suppose). A class about radicle thought seems like it could be a fairly standard philosophy, government, or even history class. </p>
<p>In fact, I think many of these classes aren’t that out there/just have provocative titles. And some need to be taken in context – while video game studies COULD be really dumb, my bet is at MIT you learn a lot about programming or how a game is constructed. In general, I think lists like these tend to look at the classes really shallowly.</p>
<p>I didn’t think these were that crazy, either. Harry Potter may not be a literary masterpiece (depending on what camp you’re on), but you’d be stupid to say it wasn’t a huge factor on our generation. Why not study it?</p>
<p>I’d hardly trust FOX to have a clue about pedagogy. Someday these over-exploitive, surface-skimming bozos will wake up and comprehend that critical thinking is fostered through the form of inquiry, not the content. Perhaps FOX should attend Oxidental and explore Stupidity 101, since they so often resemble that remark.</p>
<p>“Female Sexuality-Assigned homework readings range from “I’m not fat, I’m Latina” and “Myth of the black butt” to “How to have energy orgasms” and plenty of other titles that we can’t print here.”
LOL.</p>
<p>I’m sad that my college’s “Psychology of South Park” class didn’t make it. :< Unfortunately it’s limited to freshman living in a specific dorm anyway.</p>
<p>I would so take the tree climbing class. :B</p>
<p>There is a class at my college that analyzes the book “Twilight.” When I first saw it on the courses list I was like huh? It’s not even deep enough to be analyzed! At the very least get something like Harry Potter, which is readable and more meaningful…</p>
<p>Twilight says more about gender roles, sexuality, marriage, etc than Harry Potter says about anything, and I happen to think that Twilight is the worst thing to happen to YA fiction.</p>
<p>That being said, I don’t find these courses to be odd in anyway.</p>
<p>My college has had a Harry Potter class for four years now that sounds pretty similar to the one listed, and it was one of my favorite classes I’ve taken, we had a lot of good discussions.</p>
<p>“I don’t see what’s wacky about Radical Thought from Karl Marx to George Bush (other than the argument over whether Bush actually is radical, I suppose).”</p>
<p>No, it’s wacky because W isn’t capable of thought. Certainly not serious, original thought.</p>