i also put fascinating
how is it more fascinating though…
I put dramatic.
Does anyone remember the Identifying Errors where the worker was accused of doing something wrong. Was that no error or was “implied” the error?
Even better = more fascinating
Falsely dramatic
Implied should be implicated
I said no error @Chrysanthemum14 , but I’m unsure.
Shoot, do you guys think -2 or -3 math (one grid-in, one MC) could still potentially be 750+? The only reason I retook this SAT was to get an 800 on math…so screwed
yeah i thought implied was the error since i thought it shouldve been “inferred”
IDK THO
clearly my name is a misnomer
@glasshours i had a friend take this test got 3 wrong and got a 700…
For the psychological one, did anyone get for the question about the primary purpose of a question as introduction to the central hypothesis? I was torn between that and the acknowledgement of a trivial finding
@glasshours Personally I thought the math was easier than usual so I don’t think the curve will be too lenient… but I’m not sure. 
Does any one remember what is the correct passage for the writing.
@Q7heng more fascinating (thought that was an ~interesting~ answer, but only one that worked)
What about the Writing question with “perspective”? That was an error because it should be “prospective”?
For the “even better” one didn’t they say the second experiment proved something /expanded upon something from that the first experiment could not/from the first experiment.
Therefore it would be more accurate?
@Q7heng it was the trivial one
@chrysanthemum i thought it was more fascinating because it didn’t expand on the first but said that something from the first could do something that wasn’t expected…
I circle PERSPETIVE cuz it seems nonsense
@chrysanthemum14, that was my reasoning too. because the second one provided a case where there were people WITHOUT frontal lobes. that allowed psychologists to deduce the role of physiological sensations. (like using negative controls in an experiment to gain more accurate reads)
@Newdle
I put no error for that put “perspective” was throwing me off.
@Chrysanthemum14 - 90% sure it’s not more accurate. Both experiments were accurate, just different in nature.
@Chrysanthemum14 I thought it was ‘more fascinating’ instead of accurate because accuracy usually means free from error and there weren’t any errors in the first experiment, the second experiment was just adding new info to what had already been discovered.