The options were granular, conjectural, probabilistic, infallible, and instantaneous.
I can’t remember what I put.
@jsweets17 I put that down. I think it’s right.
@kuma184
The curve is national.
But your friend must be wrong about their score. 5 wrong with a 10 essay is definitely not a 550. That’s in the upper 600s/lower 700s.
@HughHuang96824 - Yes. The apparent contradiction between claim and evidence or whatever was right.
@Chrysanthemum14 I think it was “granular.” It talked about zooming in and “small” stuff. This fits “granular.”
The correct answer was definitely granular
What were everyone’s opinions on the CR for this SAT? I remember the March one was very controversial and many people scored lower than usual. I thought this CR was okay, although there were definitely tricky questions.
The improving paragraphs section, the baby carrots one. The sentence was something like “Parents, in particular, liked the carrots for so and so reasons.” Did you say to delete it from the paragraph by any chance…?
was the purpose of the history one to analyze the textbooks used??
Okay thanks…It was a tough question. I am pretty sure the first 4 lines of the history book passage were falsely dramatic. It got all intense but it was only ‘the ending of a history book’ or whatever. I am pretty confident that was the answer…
Did anyone have the cr section with the passage on evolution and lizards with the bar graph? Could that have been the experimental? (I had four CR sections)
@Em1509
No you needed to keep it as is.
@Chrysanthemum14 Ditto, I said keep as is.
The purpose of the history passage was to criticize how they always end, not to analyze the whole books.
Ack! I was extremely conflicted. The reason I ended up deleting it is just because it didn’t directly relate to the topic of the sentence. Ack!
@MileSwimmerDude Good I got that one
In the writing section for the dog breed sentence did you say “among which are”, “among them are”, or other…?
@Em1509
You needed a reason to explain why they started to soar in popularity. If you deleted it there was no actual evidence.
Thats right, thanks
@MileSwimmerDude Thats what i got, i was afraid it was too absolute but