***Official 2015 June SAT (US Only) THREAD***

@EasyNotSoMuch123 yes, implied was wrong (should have been implicated). so was perspective (should have been prospective)

@Chrysanthemum14 I had that as a grid in

@EasyNotSoMuch123 Yeah I marked implied.

I had h(x) as a grid-in too. I was confused because for 0, you had to go from right to left (all my answers were left to right).

here’s the most realistic outcome of #satgate imo… We get our scores on June 25 as expected. Collegeboard never admits any wrongdoing or makes any sort of press release. After evaluating how widespread damage was (a.k.a. what percentage of students got 25) by accessing proctor’s guides, they will most likely apply a small curve to the scores of people who had 25 minutes and just give us those scores. I think they will make every effort to get them to us on June 25–– that way it seems like there never was an issue ('cause I’m sure there are some people who never even realized that there was a mistake or that it was a big deal).

@Newdle Yep I was confused for a minute or two. Luckily it was the last question so I had the chance to put in 0 in the second column. Also, if you look at the back of the booklet, it specifically said that anywhere in the box is fine as long as it fits.

@16elir yeah, that might happen. After all, there are only so many CCers (and some Redditers).

anybody got lies as an answer for the writing section.I just want to confirm whether it is experimental or not

For the maoi passage, was there an answer imaginative description of a real process © or something objective observation (A)?

To be honest I just think CB is going to sweep this under the rug.

Like this if you are a strong, independent vegetable who don’t need no baby carrot.

i put imaginative idk if its right

@jason112 the description of the islanders was something as simple as in the past, they moved the statue by rolling woods. I don’t understand how that is an imaginative description.

did any one get 83 for a math mutiple choice about pages…IDK the questions

@jason112 yes, there was an 83

@jason112 I got 80 something. 83 sounds about right… Or 86? Actually EDIT Yes, it was 83.

Yes it was 83.

really freak out on CR…I failed to understand the passage

thx.

@HughHuang96824 no, the islanders said the statues moved themselves, so the the researcher took it as a imaginative description of an actual natural process that was not understood by the islanders, thus ‘imaginative’. I had to read it twice to make sure.