<p>1:
2:
3:
4: 2
5: 17</p>
<p>1.
2.
3.
4.
5. 18</p>
<p>1:
2:
3:
4: 2
5: 19</p>
<p>1:
2:
3:
4: 2
5: 20</p>
<p>1:
2:
3:
4: 2
5: 21</p>
<p>1:
2:
3:
4: 2
5: 22</p>
<p>Jumped up and down when my teacher told me I got a 5. :)</p>
<p>1:
2:
3: 1
4: 2
5: 22</p>
<p>1:
2:
3: 1
4: 2
5: 23</p>
<p>1:
2:
3: 1
4: 2
5: 24</p>
<p>1:
2:
3: 1
4: 2
5: 25</p>
<p>Most everyone at my school scored 5. We all thought the test was way too easy compared to the practice tests we’ve took (the '08 and FR problems).</p>
<p>BTW, most everyone here at CC is pretty book smart anyway, so there should be more 5s and 4s anyway.</p>
<p>1:
2:
3: 1
4: 2
5: 26</p>
<p>Although obviously those getting 1s and 2s aren’t running to tell everyone and to see how others did. Discussing what we thought of the test and asking questions might get more of the response you’re looking for. </p>
<p>For example, I wasn’t expecting a five. I thought the test was somewhat hard, and the written response questions frazzled me. Anyone with a similar experience?</p>
<p>^jordie1915: definitely agree with you. I had a great year w/ a great teacher and thought I was well-prepared for the test, but I was extremely depressed after I walked out of the testing room. lol. </p>
<p>I thought the MC was straight forward and easy, no issues, but then the FRQs almost screwed me over. haha, I remember scribbling several times in one part of the frq and I ended up writing, “Sorry, I forgot the formula, and there’s no more space ):” ----with the sad face too. </p>
<p>BUT, I ended up getting 5s on both the BC and AB subscore!! Wasn’t expected, but I’m not complaining (:</p>
<p>1:
2:
3: 1
4: 2
5: 27</p>
<p>I really did not expect a 5. Throughout the school year, I was looking at a low 4 at best. And I got a bad 3 on my mock exam. When I left the testing room, I felt that I had potentially bombed it. The MC and first two FRQs seemed easy. The last four FRQs killed me. I don’t think I fully answered one.</p>
<p>1:
2:
3: 1
4: 2
5: 28</p>
<p>Not expected, but I’ll take it any day.</p>
<p>I got a 5 on the AB sub-score, but a 4 on the BC exam. Is this bad? It kind of seems like it after reading this forum. Also, does anybody know how my results reflect my preparedness for taking Calc III? Any advice will be appreciated. Thanks.</p>
<p>1:
2:
3: 1
4: 2
5: 29</p>
<p>I thought I made a bubbling error on the non-calculator part of MC, but I guess not. (Either that or the curve was really good.) I thought it was fairly easy after self-studying it in the summer before and reviewing with prep books a week or two before the exam, so meh.</p>