<p>I never used Barrons, I used Mike Barrett’s black book and Dr Steve’s (I only used Dr Steve for math)</p>
<p>I basically just made the distance from her house to the other place be 60 miles. Then I calculated how long it would take her going there and back using both speeds then I played around with the answers until a number matched those results.</p>
<p>@gourmand I got 3 NE for Error identification, 3 for the first sentence improvement (1-11) and i think i got 3 on the last section but not 100% sure about that one.</p>
<p>Good point. Can anyone find the 2013 November SAT curve?</p>
<p>Yo @Woandering you had a writing experimental, was that section 3, with the legit writing @ section 7?</p>
<p>I think that our curve might be a little better than November’s because there were a few (key word) questions that were challenging. Like the tangent line one, the car miles per hour one, the arc one with 3/4 circumference. I think our curve will probably go</p>
<p>-0 800
-1 760
-2 730
-3 710
-4 690
-5 670</p>
<p>@ashgabat
Nope, experimental was at 7 and it was super obvious. It was not SAT style writing.</p>
<p>@RHSclassof16
I was asking 2013 November SAT, not 2014, because we have the same test as 2013 November.</p>
<p>@RHSclassof16 That’s a very famous problem - answer is definitely 48. Easiest way to do it is through harmonic mean:</p>
<p>Harmonic mean of set of integers a<em>1, a</em>2, … a<em>n = n/(1/a</em>1+1/a<em>2+…+1/a</em>n). In this case, 2/(1/40 + 1/60) = 48. Works for all related rate problems I think.</p>
<p>I think i got the same expirimental section as you @woandering . was yours about Michelangelo? </p>
<p>@Woandering was our test the experimental stuff in November 2013 or the actual November 2013 questions that were scored?</p>
<p>@Woandering Darn. That was the one I felt I did better on xD. Ah well. Dunno how I couldn’t tell between the two really, but eh.</p>
<p>Edit: wait, @dallascowboys1 Michelangelo? I didn’t have that.</p>
<p>The math section in the November 2013 is identical to the one we took today.</p>
<p>@ashgabat Lol I wish they put a related rates problem on the SAT. I would get it right and most people wouldn’t so the curve would be better.</p>
<p>@RHSclassof16 eh whatever those types of problems on the SAT are called xD</p>
<p>But ya Calc ^^</p>
<p>@dallascowboys1
No, mine was about Pompeii.</p>
<p>@RHSclassof16
Our non-experimental parts are exactly the same as November 2013 non-experimental. Everything from ours was in theirs.</p>
<p>@ashgabat @RHSclassof16
If they put those types of problems on the SAT, everyone would study for them, and the result would be similar. </p>
<p>I didnt know they were allowed to recycle old tests for new SATs?!?!?! What if somebody took the November 2013 SAT wouldnt that be an unfair advantage?</p>
<p>I JUST REMEMBERED A MATH PROBLEM. it was which one of these isn’t divisible? choices were like x, y, y^2-1, etc etc. anyone remember? i put y^2-1</p>
<p>Screw related rates. Was it November 2013 international? Because the US Nov 13 was different</p>
<p>@thegrant
Exactly. I don’t know why they recycled it this time…and they should have used something further back.</p>
<p>@collegepursuit
Yeah its w=xy^2. What isn’t a factor? The answer is y.</p>