<p>@ratmkino the answer to the art exhibit was ‘16 women and mostly white men’ or something…the statement about ppl being rele good was just to show how the owner was obviously unfair/trying to justify his actions. Anyone else agree?</p>
<p>Yes, C was at the bottom left of the page</p>
<p>And also, anyone remember the question for the one about the guerilla exhibit?</p>
<p>@CSIHSIS, do you remember the sentence for the question with “understood” as a choice?
I don’t understand how it’s “have understood”. I put “understood”</p>
<p>@yankeedood I dont even remember any sixteen answer…maybe im confusing it with a different passage</p>
<p>Bigpaki, all I remember is that the word directly before the underlined portion was “must” so must understood is wrong. Must have understood.</p>
<p>It was choice C but it wasn’t the end of the paragraph.</p>
<p>@CSIHSIS, thanks, that seems obvious… idk why I missed that.
Hopefully -5 is a 36. Here’s to staying positive :))))))))))))))))))))))</p>
<p>What are your guys’ current ACT scores?</p>
<p>I really could’ve sworn that understood question was which one wouldn’t work…and I don’t remember the word must. I’m pretty sure I put ‘has understood’ cuz it was the only one not in past tense</p>
<p>No way in hell is -5 ever a 36. I would be upset if it were.</p>
<p>@ratmkino
Don’t worry, as far as I know, -2 has never been a 36 (I may be mistaken).</p>
<p>Here’s something that may cheer you up: [Photo</a> Album - Imgur](<a href=“http://imgur.com/a/t7U2E]Photo”>Imgur: The magic of the Internet)</p>
<p>I know it may not happen but it might…</p>
<p>@act34, where did you get those curves? They’re awesome! O.o</p>
<p>@LiamNeeson It’s not that I think -1 or -2 wouldn’t be acceptable. To tell you the truth, I wish the ACT makers would own up to the at least slight level of subjectivity on their English sections sometimes and make 74 or 73 a 36. Of course there ultimately always is one correct answer in their eyes, but there must be a reason they do it on the other sections. If they don’t do what’s necessary to equalize all of the tests–especially around the 34-36 range–then what good is the ACT? If it’s more about being lucky and getting an easy test then is it really a reliable tool to use to differentiate between the perfect (36) and the almost perfect (35)? On the other end of the spectrum, if the 36 is given out too easily–like the 5 is on AP exams–then what good is having scaled scores in the first place? Scaled scores are meant to equate the level of success on each test with one another, not nebulize the best of us. Maybe it’s not the tests though. Maybe it’s just the fact that each of us has our own weaknesses and certain tests happen to briefly delve into them and reflect them in their true ugly form.
I’m not asking for answers, just venting.</p>
<p>@skylimits I got these directly from the Red Book; they were actually used previously :)</p>
<p>@ratmkino
Yeah, I completely understand. I was just saying -2 because if that’s never a 36, a -5 is far off from ever being a 36. In my opinion, I think the 4 subjects are pretty well equalized, just going off of statistics from the ACT website. Personally, the English section was the only section I scored a 36 on in February and I’m expecting another 36 (hopefully) for this test. That being said, a perfect score on any of the 4 sections seems to be 50% luck, but anything 33+ is pretty much ability.</p>
<p>Yeah. But on the English section usually 70 of the questions are like sleepers. Then the last 5 take some thought and are used to separate the upper scores. It sucks because a bubbling error = 35 and having 75 questions gives many opportunities to make a stupid mistake haha. Luckily I had enough time afterwards to check my bubbles on English so I probably will get a 36–hopefully.</p>
<p>@LiamNeeson</p>
<p>One of the Red Book Reading Tests has a 38 / 40 = 36. So I’m assuming that there have been tests out there with a -2 = 36.</p>
<p>The only one that I had trouble with was one about LEDs. I can’t remember it now, but it was along the lines of “Long gone are the days when LEDs ________ emit only a small red light.” It asked which of these are not acceptable. I could, would, can, I forgot the other. I chose “would”, but then changed it to “can” due to the fact that in some cases LEDs still emit only small red lights. Can anyone help? Did I overthink this?</p>