<p>ncdukie: it was definitely the plant and habitat choice, because in the next sentence or two it adressed the habitat</p>
<p>@NCdukie i wasn’t so sure about that either. I put yes because of habitat and all that jazzz.</p>
<p>Was “-LED for short-” or “, LED” NOT an acceptable alternative to “, LED,”?</p>
<p>@future: It’s strung, as in the led lights were strung from the ceiling</p>
<p>@skylimits that’s what I thought, everyone on here’s saying “sprung” though…</p>
<p>@yoyo I put “,LED” for that one, pretty sure I’m right.</p>
<p>@shiz and dukie I put no for that one, take it fwiw</p>
<p>Yes, what was the incorrect one for LED?</p>
<p>i thought i put the answer that was missing a comma for that one</p>
<p>i thought the incorrect answer for the LED question was diode-LED-</p>
<p>it was -LED-</p>
<p>I also put the one with the comma missing!</p>
<p>For the one about the volcano, I said no because it moves from the plant to the volcano. Definitely not sure though, the other one makes sense too.</p>
<p>^ i put yes because its about the habitat</p>
<p>and im pretty sure the LED one was the one with the missing comma, that answer choice would not make sense…</p>
<p>i’m pretty sure it was yes. it was describing the harsh habitat in which the plant grew in.</p>
<p>For the last paragraph with LED where one of the options was (what’s more) or something like that what did everyone get?</p>
<p>i think people overlooked one answer choice, there should have been a comma in one and without it it couldnt work</p>
<p>@bigjim2 I said what’s more</p>
<p>bigjim, if you’re talking about the same one I think you are, I put “to sum up”. Anyone else?</p>
<p>@set, yes there was one missing a comma, which would be grammatically incorrect</p>
<p>yes whats more…</p>
<p>Yeah, one of those had a pretty glaring reason it didn’t work but I can’t remember which one.</p>