***Official Nov 2014 SAT (US ONLY)***

<p>@Chalmydia how does she feel about the island? that question</p>

<p>@Chalmydia‌ For what question was best answered I remember putting what the author thought about the house, or osme variation of that answer. </p>

<p>@Pistachionut1996‌ elobrate</p>

<p>@cartmann2400 It was no, because it was tedious</p>

<p>Ughh I suck at spelling</p>

<p>^ alright</p>

<p>There were two different stores you can buy the products. It asked for the greatest profit </p>

<p>@Pistachionut1996‌ I chose the second one from the left. The difference I believe was the greatest</p>

<p>And for the question that asked for the leveling integer or something. The middle integer was the sum of the first and third and the third integer was 4. I think I put 5 for that </p>

<p>Does anyone know the answer to the “fundamental character” one in the pencil passage?</p>

<p>@Pistachionut1996‌ Yep, that’s what I got as well. I just listed out, 154, 264, 374, 484, 594. Therefore, 5 </p>

<p>Question for the last math grid in with answer 13? Also did people get an answer to a CR question about punctuation with “arbitrary” in the answer? (can’t remember question)</p>

<p>@TheCHAMPION‌ I said fundamental character for the usage of “nature” in the passage but I swear three of the answers could have been correct.</p>

<p>redrabbit, that was the one asking how author of passage 2 views meaning without correct punctuation</p>

<p>I dont think I put arbitrary, but instead put “further clarified by punctuation” for that question… I’m not too sure now @redrabbit23‌ </p>

<p>For homeopathy was it the lack of scientific research and antecdote why the “scientists” were skeptical, or because the cure was after a wrong remedy or something like that?</p>

<p>Ah @cartman2400‌ you definitely could be right but my reasoning was that the author of passage 2 said in the end that w/ out punctuation, writing has a lot of ambiguity and with punctuation it had the potential to be completely clear so I thought that author 2 would say that w/ out punctuation the meaning would be not clear/ arbitrary. Not quite sure though :confused: </p>

<p>@redrabbit23 yeah I put that at first and then changed it to “unspoiled quality” … I think fundamental nature is right though :(</p>

<p>@Pistachionut1966 I said scientific research and @theCHAMPION I thought that three of the answers could be potentially correct, IMO didn’t think that was a fair question</p>

<p>@redrabbit23‌ What was the wording of the arbitrary answer choice? I might’ve put it, but idk…</p>