<p>"I think you wrongly used "equilibrium" in that context :-p"</p>
<p>I am quite aware of that. However, I personally conceptualize it as a line from which everything can be judged objectively. I don't care what the literal meaning of the word is.</p>
<p>for the last question, all i remember was that the answer was C and that it was not the answer that said "The author of passage 2 fully supports his job, while the author of passage 1 blah blah" ..... the author did not fully support his job - he was saying negative things about it .....</p>
<p>nasty and lame? lol
yeah i put hopeful
the second to last question -
from a professional point of view was one answer
to urge workers to do something was another
i have these words floating in my head, i just remember bits and pieces</p>
<p>yes, now that you said it .. C was "Passage 2 speaks from a profession point of view, while Passage 1 is based on generalizations .... something like that ..
I also remeber putting to urge workers
I think we both got 100% on that passage</p>
<p>there has to be a way to Help each other DURING teh PSAT /SAT
like collusion.....maybe satelite instant messenging in TI calculators?
anyone want to invest in the tech donate to me ...jkjk</p>
<p>perpetuated for the animal eating plants one i think .. so it wasnt paradigm? you positive?
i'm not sure about 100% lol i think i did so bad on this thing
then again i feel like that with a lot of tests i take ..
it's really high for texas, good luck man</p>