<p>For anyone who took it today.</p>
<p>It was fair, we should wait until testing closes in an hour before discussing it.</p>
<p>true</p>
<p>ughh anticipating a 740-790</p>
<p>I omitted one. Knew LBJ’s Great Society didn’t guarantee enployment (the answer choice didn’t even make sense) though I wasn’t 100% and didn’t pull the trigger.</p>
<p>Honestly, timing got the best of me and I wasn’t able to answer 9 of them. </p>
<p>I took two tests today and as far as difficulty of tests, I thought US History was harder. I thought Lit was easier.</p>
<p>@playforever I felt kinda funny about that one too, but I did go for it. </p>
<p>@whartonpls I think I’d be happy with a 740-790 at this point.</p>
<p>Really? @JuniorBengal </p>
<p>I ran through US in 20-30 mins and had tons of time to think on the harder ones.</p>
<p>Was really stressed for time on Lit, had to answer the last 20 questions (& read their passages) in roughly 10 min.</p>
<p>any answers on the top of your heads?</p>
<p>what was the detente / salt I one? (#90)
also, who was the quote by that said like “We are not fighting a hostile armies but a hostile nation… somethinga bout going into dangerous territory?”</p>
<p>@whartonpls I didn’t really like that question, as it gave Richard Nixon AND Gerald Ford as an option. They both sponsored Detente, as they were both incumbents at the executive at the same time. I leaned Nixon because of New Federalism, which is usually associated with Nixon and Reagan.</p>
<p>It was fair, I leaned toward Nixon too, remember seeing it on Barron’s and also thinking about Kissinger </p>
<p>So much easier than ally practise tests!</p>
<p>The quote was by Sherman (Sherman’s March to the Sea where the Union matched through the south and burned down their entire infrastructure essentially.) “Hostile nation” was the key, it had to be someone from the north convincing his troops that they weren’t fighting their own people, Make sense?</p>
<p>The Nixon/Ford question was one of those questions that preys on those who know their stuff. Both presidents ran Detente and attempted deescalation, but SALT is a Nixon policy (though Nixon really didn’t try to end Vietnam so I’m not sure what the question was talking about.) Went with Ford but changed it to Nixon.</p>
<p>Does anyone know the answer to the erie canal question? I thought it would intensify sectionalism because it unified the west/north and alienated the south- but i could also see how it made crops cheaper to transport. </p>
<p>I found that it was similar to the 2011
<a href=“December SAT II US HIstory - #16 by starchywinky - SAT Subject Test Preparation - College Confidential Forums”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-subject-tests-preparation/1251875-december-sat-ii-us-history-p2.html</a>
I wanted to get an 800 but I think I should retake it. I guessed almost half of questions and hope if it’s correct.</p>
<p>If this is accurate, I don’t think the curve is bad at all. <a href=“SparkNotes: Today's Most Popular Study Guides”>SparkNotes: Today's Most Popular Study Guides;
<p>@flaminhotcheetos The construction of the Erie Canal made it easy to transport goods from the west(well, the Great Lakes area) to the east</p>
<p>I felt like overall it was okay. There was one I should have answered but I hestitated and left it blank towards the end, because I was afraid I missed it. Otherwise then that nothing much.</p>
<p>What was the one with the map? Was it foreign-born population or wheat agriculture?</p>
<p>@Esat936 I leaned foreign-born population because it was darkest in the outer parts of the country, particularly in Arizona, Southern Texas, New Mexico, Florida, and Southern California. That was my best guess because I basically know nothing about wheat growth.</p>
<p>@JuniorBengal Same, but Pennsylvania was pretty dark and so were some of the other Midwestern states, so I have my doubts. </p>