<p>Post more answers I’m worried</p>
<p>I think I did terrible…</p>
<p>Don’t worry, I believe that the curve will be generous.
There were so many reading comprehension questions. </p>
<p>That was easily the hardest history test I have ever taken. The first half was deceivingly easy, but then it got oppressingly difficult. Literally the questions were so specific… Made the ap world history test look like a cakewalk. I skipped like 40 and probably missed like 15. Don’t even want to see my scores lol</p>
<p>Ended up cancelling my scores. Jesus Christ.</p>
<p>Anyone else trying to decide whether to cancel or not? Do we know if the test being really hard is going to effect the curve much</p>
<p>Did you guys get Rousseau for one question?</p>
<p>I remember him being a choice for one of the questions but I dont think i picked him.</p>
<p>I legit took the test backwards. I started with the more modern questions and worked my way backwards through history. My test was set up chronologically it seemed, don’t know if it’s always that way. I found it pretty hard, actually praying for like a 650 with the way I preformed…</p>
<p>@prc143 do you remember the question with rousseau</p>
<p>It was a quote on the bourgeois</p>
<p>@CalMartin </p>
<p>it was lenin</p>
<p>It wasnt too bad. There was a lot of passage based questions but they were easier than some of the specific questions in my opinion. </p>
<p>I put Rousseau, but now I think it was Lenin. There were some questions that were vague. What other questions do you guys think were hard?</p>
<p>What inspired Bolivars revolution?</p>
<p>Do you think the curve will be generous? Idk if I should cancel my score. At what point would a score be considered bad or harmful on a college app?</p>
<p>How about the one with what did the introduction of firearms lead to in Japan? was it the unification under the Tokugawa?</p>
<p>You would want over a 750 for the ivies\stanford\mit. Above a 700 for the top 30s.</p>
<p>If you have at least two other sat subject scores over 700, its probably fine I’d youre in the 650-690 range ( except for the ivies) . However if you only have one other test anything under a 700 can be kind of harmful
ot very impressive for upper tier schools.l</p>
<p>A 610-690 can be kind of dangerous although it isn’t necessarily an awful score. </p>
<p>Anything under a 600 will always look very bad. </p>
<p>hey, the google docs for most of the SAT IIs are getting ■■■■■■■ so i thought i’d set a tinychat up for SAT world history. join and discuss! <a href=“Live video chat rooms, simple and easy. - Tinychat”>Live video chat rooms, simple and easy. - Tinychat;
<p>Do you guys think the curve for this test will be generous? I omitted six and probably got around twelve wrong. What score would that be?</p>