<p>I'll concede to your point about Suez, kibitzer. I'm not as comfortable with really recent history as I am with the rest of it, so I won't be the most reliable source on Eisenhower. I had that question down to either Suez or desegregation. </p>
<p>Are there any more questionable ones?</p>
<p>I said the US was the biggest source of raw cotton, not cotton sheets, or cotton products, or whatever the phrasing was.</p>
<p>For the 3 possible numbers about labor unions, I chose I, II, and III. They teamed up (afl-cio), they had trouble keeping members (Knights of Labor, post Haymarket Square), and...what was the 2nd one? something about organization of unskilled laborers? anyway. </p>
<p>The farmers formed politcal groups to fight back- the Grange, Populists, etc.</p>
<p>The text talking about the unfair advantages of the rich and the inability of the rest of the population to benefit....was supporting Social Gospel, i believe. It might have been Social Darwinism, but that ideology validated the phenomenon described in the text, but the words had a negative tone, meaning the author disliked the Darwinism concept. Social Gospel focused on a trickling down of wealth- the extremely affluent would get rich, and their success would help out the poor.</p>
<p>Temperance fought against public drunkenness.</p>
<p>Abolition was the end of slavery, obviously.</p>
<p>Gulf of Tonkin referred to Vietnam, as did the Tet Offensive.</p>
<p>The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee was against the war, led by young people disillusioned with society, etc.</p>
<p>Speaking of disillusion, that was also the topic of most writing during the Depression. </p>
<p>I couldn't remember what Cesar Chavez's later contributions were. Anyone? Also, what was the very first question?</p>