<p>“I appreciate my CC peers for clarifying Cornell’s status as second-tier university. But, do people really consider Cornell is on par with UPenn (CAS), Brown, Duke, UChicago, or Johns Hopkins?”</p>
<p>What in the world? you do realize all the schools in the top 20 are top tier right? And yes, people actually do consider that (Shocking!)</p>
<p>Considering most CC users on this thread agree that the difference (I will not reiterate what involves in this ‘difference’) between HYPSM and Cornell is not very significant, I assume Cornell is definitely a peer-institution with the above universities.</p>
<p>“But, Why? why do I see a dozen of CC threads claiming any intellectual students knowing what Ivy-league means will choose Duke over Cornell? and why do I see a random website demonstrating how UPenn or Brown undergraduates proudly reveal the colleges they attend with the real names of their respective colleges, whereas Cornell undergraduates mostly resorts to ivy-league title?”</p>
<ol>
<li>You know who says that? Duke students. Also, yeah it is really wrong to choose Cornell just because of its ivy league title. The ivy league is simply a football league.<br></li>
<li>Never have I or anybody else I know of in Cornell ever do anything of the sort. That kind of demeaning behavior is only seen on shows like the office - on which someone mentioned the pretentious failure Andy Bernard was pretty much a shot at Cornell and in no way a stereotypical Cornell student. Contrast him to Mitchell Pritchett, the successful Cornell grad from modern family. Oh wait, nobody has heard of him before? That’s probably because it’s harder to make fun of him.</li>
</ol>
<p>“I’m getting very sick of this pattern manifested over and over again in numerous CC threads and a bunch other community websites. And it seems that people do not even consider Cornell to be placed in the same level as the second-tier universities. I remember a current Cornell student started a thread named “are people out of mind?” reassuring Cornell’s indeed on par with the schools right below HYPSM. This apparently proves my point that many people nowadays consider Cornell to be inferior to the second-tier schools, and I do not quite fully understand.”</p>
<p>The people you are talking about are the figments of your imagination and ccers with life/ego problems who clearly lack in the department of achievement. When you graduate, what matters are your achievements and your connections - and Cornell will take you just as far as its peers (EVEN HYPSM) if you are accomplished to the same degree, with the possible exclusion of the exclusive networks that i mentioned HYP have. The difference is that it may be easier to get those opportunities in those 5 colleges than Cornell and they may have a higher concentration of nobel level professors, but Cornell doesn’t lose in any of these departments to its other ivy peers. This is me being REALISTIC.</p>
<p>I don’t know what you expected. When people ask an inflammatory question like that (LIKE THIS THREAD), people respond negatively. It’s simple as that. Honestly, the thread topic was already a bit irksome because of how you threw a fit over such a small detail, but now it’s just obvious that you’re asking for a reaction and you’ve got one. There is seriously nothing to speculate on.</p>
<p>Actually the more you post, the more it seems to be obvious that you are the same ■■■■■ we’ve had for years. It doesn’t help that your first thread is so inflammatory (THIS THREAD) and that you’ve recently signed up and claim knowledge of old posts that the exact ■■■■■ i mentioned made. I’ve also noticed that you use the same type of roundabout reasoning that they did - these past trolls that pop up every 2 months or so, disappear, and make new accounts to post the EXACT SAME CONTENT like you are doing now. Perhaps the most indicative evidence is that you cherrypick what to read in this thread/forum and raise the same points over and over again. You’re not looking for an answer, you’re looking for a fight. The first 2-3 pages would have been enough to convince ANYONE who’s actually curious in the question they posted. But now, you’ve gone completely off on a tangent from your thread topic due to your effort to attack Cornell. You’ve shown your true colors, ■■■■■.</p>