<p>I was curious to hear your opinions and thoughts about upcoming rankings for Cornell in the next few years. Do any of you think that Cornell will break top 10 or 12? What do you predict the admit rate will be in the next few years? Dyson and Engineering are both impeccable as well as many other programs.</p>
<p>IMHO Cornell’s isolation has caused it to stay behind other universities of its class. Cornell could do better if it was around a semi-urban area where the climate or the location would not prevent students, faculty or companies from choosing Cornell.</p>
<p>These “ratings” are heavily influenced by admit rate & average test scores. Cornell’s size and diversity of majors (motto of “any person, any study”), some of which lend themselves to taking students with “subpar Ivy league” test scores, are going to ensure that they never overtake the majority of colleges “ranked” ahead of them.</p>
<p>You never know. Since College Ranking business is aiming for making money, they need to change methodologies from time to time. </p>
<p>When people understand a little more of student body academic strength and freshman class size relation, and the ranking companies decide to use a different way to measure it, Cornell certainly is one of the tops.</p>
<p>Freshman student body SAT Strength 2012-2013
(the starting SAT score of these universities’ top 800 )</p>
<p>rankings are not a proper way to determine which college you want to apply to. Besides, I think Cornell is actually better than those other schools ranked higher for taking people with lower tests scores because you simply cannot judge people on whether they’re great test takers or not. A great university has a diverse student body.</p>
<p>If any rankings are really going to be used to help prospective students decide on where to apply and which one to go (if corss-admitted), they should be ranked by categories.</p>
<p>Separate them out to rank faculty/alumni academic achievement, rank student body academic strenth, rank resources, rank the student satisfactory of campus enviroment, rank average salary, rank tuition/graduate staring salary, rank tuition/life-long income…etc. and let people decide what area they care the most. Lump everything together just wouldn’t mean anything anymore.</p>
<p>My alma mater was #1 the year I graduated. That plus a dollar will get me a sweet tea at McDonalds.</p>
<p>The OP’s question belies the shallow and simplistic nature of most of the public about “prestige” and perceptions. They have almost nothing to do with real life.</p>
<p>All college rankings are highly subjective. Cornell was just named the 13th best university in the world for the 3rd year in a row by the Academic Ranking of World Universities. Cornell was ranked 14th in the world in the annual QS World University rankings. None of these rankings are meaningful. They do sell magazines though.</p>
<p>It’s sad that people really buy into these rankings. Sometimes I wish they did not exist and people would just choose a school based on what is best for them, as individuals.</p>
<p>It was ranked higher than stanford for international universities…If you even care.
Rankings don’t mean anything when it comes to academics. The only reason you would care is if your goal in life is to put a harvard sticker on your car and proceed to live the rest of your life with your head in the sand</p>
<p>Break the top ten nationally? Eh… maybe… I don’t think Cornell will ever beat;</p>
<p>Harvard (Who beats Harvard anyways…?)
Princeton
Yale
MIT
Stanford
Duke
Caltech
Dartmouth
UPenn
Hopkins</p>
<p>Brown, Notre Dame, and UC Berkeley are comparable. I doubt Cornell can break the top ten though. I know I am going to get a lot of negative responses because I put Hopkins and Dartmouth ahead of Cornell but I just think thats how it is. Cornell is still a great school but it ever coming close to HYPMS overall I doubt it. I really think Duke would fit in better to the Ivy League than Cornell really… But thats just my opinion. It is just a sports league after all.</p>