<p>
</p>
<p>Well, you’re right that SAT Subject Test scores aren’t reported in the Common Data Set. But that’s because the Common Data Set is a data set that’s designed for all colleges to report, and since so few colleges require SAT Subject Tests it wouldn’t make sense to include it in the CDS. But that doesn’t mean they’re unimportant at the handful of schools that require or “recommend” or “strongly encourage” them.</p>
<p>I also think you’re missing the larger point about the role of test scores, GPAs, or any other individual factor in admission to the most selective colleges and universities. Sure, these schools reject most people with perfect 800s. They also reject most valedictorians and most people with perfect 4.0 GPAs. But that doesn’t mean test scores, GPAs, and class ranks are unimportant; they’re among the most important factors. It’s just that they have so many extremely well qualified candidates by these criteria that they end up choosing among them on the basis of other factors, giving preferences to legacies, recruited athletes, and URMs, for example, or throwing in geographic and socioeconomic diversity factors, celebrity status, artistic talent, and the like, or going for the applicant with the unusually clever and attention-getting (but not over-the-top) essay. Like it or not, that’s the system. But it doesn’t mean test scores are unimportant. They’re pretty much a prerequisite to admission to the most selective schools, especially for the “unhooked” applicant. But they’re not determinative, in the sense that even with a perfect GPA, class rank, and test scores, you still might be passed over in favor of someone the college deems more “interesting” to add to the mix, or to achieve institutional diversity goals.</p>