<p>
[quote]
Today, statistics would show us that Haas is considered a top b-school and can now be compared (in prestige, quality and standard) with the very best MBA schools you can find anywhere in the world including H/S/W.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Look. I don't believe there's really such a thing as the best b-school because best is relative to anyone's taste.
I disagree. There is most definitely an objective "best". For example, one can't claim that the San Francisco 49ers is the "best" team in the NFL because they have great colors in red and gold, a great tradition with Joe Montana, Jerry Rice, etc., and a superb location. One has to look at the team's players and how they perform on the field -- and by using this objective metric, it's pretty obvious that that the Niners aren't the best. Not even close.
Similarly, a quick way to judge a b-school is by where its graduates go. No, not by who recruits there (because there are always companies/firms that show up on campus but end up not taking anyone) or what your neighbors in your home country think of it. Look at the percentage of grads that go into the ultra selective companies/industries... over the last several years, it's been PE/VC and HFs. How does Haas compare to H/S/W? Hell, how many of those shops actually come to campus to recruit??? </p>
<p>
[quote]
For example, Wharton is an excellent b-school but it’s not my “cup of tea”, thus it does not make sense for me if I go there. However, I do believe that there's such a thing as a top MBA program, and obviously, the schools you mentioned are all top b-schools. Stanford is not really different from Columbia and Wharton just like Wharton is not any different from Harvard or Kellogg and Kellogg is not different from Chicago and Haas and Haas is not any different from Sloan, Yale, and Tuck and so on. </p>
<p>To say Harvard is the best is a relative judgement – that’s a personal opinion, more or less. HBS could be the best b-school for you but not entirely the best for some. Oftentimes, b-school aspirants look for niche (innovation of Haas, Entrepreneurship of Stanford, Marketing for Kellogg, Finance for Wharton, General Management for Harvard, etc), fit, location (I prefer the perfect weather of Norcal than the frosty East Coast), family orientation (dad went there, legacy, etc), cost and reputation based on his personal orientation.
[/quote]
What you're describing is closer to personal fit. Using the football analogy again, one should be able to separate personal affinity for a team from an objective observation of its excellence. My liking for the Niners as my hometown team with great tradition does not (and should not) preclude me from acknowledging that here and now, the best team is NOT the 49ers but rather the Pats, Colts, or Cowboys. And yet the Niners are still my team -- for personal reasons. Similarly, the personal reasons for why Haas is the school for you shouldn't blind you to some of its few shortfalls... especially relative to the Pats/Colts/Cowboys of the b-school world.</p>
<p>
[quote]
As to your comment that I’ve convinced myself…, it was actually my colleagues who convinced me to apply to Haas.
[/quote]
Again, I fully agree that Haas is a top school. However, it just doesn't offer the same amount of opportunities as some other select schools -- especially compared to H/S/W.</p>
<p>
[quote]
I’ve also done my part in establishing the fact the Haas is as good as any of the top b-schools in the planet.
[/quote]
Assuming that the metric for measuring a b-school's quality is its ability to place its graduates in highly competitive/selective industries/firms, I would say that you have not established anything to that effect.
Regardless, best of luck with your Haas application.</p>