Performing Arts Supplement Question- What is "good" enough?

<p>**Note: originally posted in another category but mathflute suggested I post here</p>

<p>Hi guys,
I will be applying to college next summer (sophomore right now) & with junior year coming up, I have a couple of questions regarding grades / extracurrics.</p>

<ol>
<li><p>Do colleges look at freshman grades? (Specifically about Columbia and UCLA, which are my top two choices) I got 1 B+ for Honors Math and B for PE in my freshman year and so far in my sophomore year I have gotten another B+ for Honors English. I heard that if I get more B's, it's harder for me to get into those colleges.</p></li>
<li><p>I heard that I should do more extracurriculars, but I only do cello (and I don't plan to try any more extracurrics- cello just takes so much of my time). I used to do Science Olympiad, Track, Robotics, FBLA, Speech, Math Club, Science Club, and participate in a couple of non-profits but recently cello has taken so much of my time that I'm just going to focus on grades & cello in my junior & senior year. (I'm in school orch and a chamber group). I hope this is ok.</p></li>
<li><p>And then I heard if I only do one extracurric, I better be "good" at it. What defines good? Like I know a couple of my cello friends in my grade have gone on to win many competitions like American Protege and they are in the Colburn School's Youth Orch and Chamber Orch (both very prestigious) and have participated in the National cello Institute, etc...but I am nowhere near that right now. I started cello relatively late in the game compared to everyone else (I've been playing for 5 years, as opposed to my friend's 10 years) and I am aiming for CYO/CCO as well this year, but so far no significant awards/achievements etc. So does "good" have to be winning a nationally known cello comp or just sending in a tape that sounds amazing?</p></li>
</ol>

<p>Also just for reference I am planning to study biology/neuroscience along with music. (But I'd much rather devote my time to cello than research)</p>

<p>Thanks!</p>

<p>This question is a hard one to answer, because the admissions process is such a minefield these days, there are all kind of claims of the magic formula and such. </p>

<p>My first question is when you say you plan on studying music, do you plan on majoring in an academic subject (neuroscience or whatever), and plan on pursuing the cello as a non major, taking lessons, etc? Or do you plan on dual majoring, where you do a performance degree in cello? This is critical, because what you plan on doing is going to affect how you go about things. Among other things, not all the schools you mention offer performance degrees. I am going to try and summarize the options:</p>

<p>1)You go to a school and study an academic major, but do music on the side. Most schools will support this in one way or the other, for example Columbia (which like the other Ivies does not offer an undergraduate music performance degree), has a program where you can take lessons at Juilliard (not the exchange program, I think it is more simple them that; the exchange program is a lot more complicated, you audition for it and it is more closer to a joint program). Other schools may actually pay for private lessons outside the school, all depends on the school.</p>

<p>2)You could go to a school and dual major, do a BS/BA in an academic field, and get a performance degree from the music school within the university. This is a tougher path, because you have to get admitted to both schools, and if you get into the music school but not the university you don’t get in, period; if you get into the university and not the music school , you can go to the university but not get a BM degree (but could potentially do music as a non major). </p>

<p>Dual majors like that usually are difficult, for any number of reasons, conflicts between music classes/ensembles and academic classes, the time needed to practice the instrument and classes/homework on the other side…it generally will be a 5 year thing if you do this, some do it in 4, but it is more like 5 (Bard college conservatory requires its students to dual major,and it is a 5 year program)</p>

<p>The thing to keep in mind is that the performance degree will be auditioned, and to get in there it basically comes down to an audition, a 10 minute or so chance to show how you play. SAT’s, APs, GPA mean little to nothing there (obviously, on the academic university side, it will count for everything. )</p>

<p>With music as an EC there is strong evidence that it can influence academic admissions, I am extremely certain that with the ivies coming in as an accomplished music student weighs pretty heavily, while they don’t have performance degrees, they have orchestras and such they put an emphasis on it. The thing there is, it depends on whether they see the kid as being serious IMO, a kid who has done a major pre college prep program like Juilliard or CIM or such, will be taken a bit more seriously then a kid who played in the school orchestra,took lessons in school and didn’t do much. Competitions might add to the ‘serious’ nature or a sign of passion, but a lot of serious music students don’t do them, either…If you plan on using your cello playing as an EC, you would need to show the passion. The reason for this is a lot of serious music students, especially on an uber competitive instrument like the cello, have to spend a lot of time on their music, they will practice x hours a day (up to 4, 5 hours for a string player), they are doing ensembles and youth orchestras, and that basically consumes a lot of their life, and schools know that…whereas if someone is simply taking lessons on an instrument, doing the school orchestra, and doesn’t do other EC’s, IMO they may look at it as someone who lacked EC’s to be considered (personally, I find the whole EC thing to be a crock of rotten banana oil, but that is for another thread).
In other words, they will look at the cello student who has done a program like CIM prep, youth orchestras and such, and say “hmm, that is a serious music student, who wouldn’t have much time for other EC’s”, if they see a kid who simply says they played the cello, maybe did school orchestra, it would be “hmm, okay, kid played the cello, yeah, school orchestra…hmm, didn’t do anything else, sounds like a kid not interested in much”)</p>

<p>It would be up to you in your application to mention that “on a typical day, I practice x hours a day, plus I do X,Y and Z”. Note if you are applying as a dual major, where you are applying to the music school to audition, the academic admissions people will note that, which I suspect will give more weight to you being a ‘serious music student’ (big difference between Sally who applies to get into the academic school, and says" I play cello", to Bob who is applying to the music school as well). </p>

<p>Cello is extremely competitive, it is near the apex on the competition scale for music school admissions, along with violin, piano and to a certain extent flute. no instrument is easy, but those are particularly bad because they are solo instruments that attract a lot of applicants, and again remember, for music performance (if that is what you want), it is all about the audition, for music school grades, SATs, etc, mean very little in terms of admissions (they could with academic scholarships, however). You face an uphill climb because you have been playing only since 10 or so, and have only been serious the last couple of years, so it may be tough in the next year and a half to pull together the audition rep and get it into audition shape, and with that and the demands of I assume a tough academic load, might make it more difficult. </p>

<p>Keep your options open. For example, some kids do a gap year after senior year if they don’t get into a program they want to, and use that year to bring their playing up to snuff. You could theoretically get an academic admit to a program with a music school, get into the academic side, spend time working with a teacher at the school or elsewhere, then audition at end of first year (this may or may not be doable, depending on the program they may not allow it, I am not sure). You could do the BA music, BA/BS in something else, then maybe go for an MM…or do a BA/BS in an academic field, and study music privately, then maybe do an MM…</p>

<p>One of the biggest things you need to do is to look at the schools you are thinking of. For example, as I mentioned, Columbia does not offer a BM, they do offer a program where students can take lessons with teachers at Juilliard (I believe ivies in general often offer similar things to students who are interested, in house or external), Columbia does have a kind of exchange/joint program with Juilliard, but the exchange program is difficult to get into, and the so called Joint program, where you get your bachelors at Columbia and then get your MM at Juilliard, is even more difficult, literally handful of students. </p>

<p>Other schools, like UCLA, do have schools of music that offer a BM, so there you could do a joint degree, assuming you got in both schools there.</p>

<p>Make a list of the schools you are thinking of, and look at their websites, you can see clearly if they offer a performance degree, if in music they offer an academic BA in music but not on instruments (theory, music history, poss composition, etc), what the requirements are for audition and so forth. Your decisions might well be predicated in terms of where you apply on what they actually offer. It is a common misconception that if a school offers a BA in music it means they have a ‘school of music’, but that is not true, and performance degrees are totally different beasts then academic ones in terms of admissions. </p>

<p>@musicprnt‌ </p>

<p>Thank you for the response! I think , since I expect the college workload to be even harder than high school, that I will just keep on playing cello in terms of orchestra and private lessons. I’m actually not sure if I want to double major because it is a lot of work/stress.</p>

<p>I’m only in 2 orchestras and a chamber group so I don’t know if that “counts”, but I will be principal cello of my school orch next year…(seniors are leaving)</p>

<p>You are fine. Here is a good essay to read about ways to study music/combine it with other studies.
<a href=“http://www.peabody.jhu.edu/conservatory/admissions/tips/doubledegree.html”>http://www.peabody.jhu.edu/conservatory/admissions/tips/doubledegree.html&lt;/a&gt; Your parents might like to read it too. It’s really helpful.</p>

<p>There are many options. You can study music at non-audition schools (most selective universities do not audition.) Music majors study theory, music history, composition, ethnomusicology, technology/music etc. Harvard and Tufts don’t audition for admission, for instance, though ensembles and orchestras do once you attend. You can also study science and do music on the side, as you are now. You can even enter as undecided and decide once on campus whether you want to study music, science, or something else that you discover.</p>

<p>You can do an arts supplement to the common app w/DVD or CD if your playing is good enough, regardless of award or performance history. Have a teacher recommendation included, a resume, and programs from concerts.Or you can just let them know you play, how much, where and that you want to continue, in the main body of the application.</p>

<p>Definitely a good thing to be involved outside of school in an orchestra, ensemble, conservatory prep or summer program or whatever, unless your school program is stellar.</p>

<p>Don’t do extracurriculuars for the sake of admissions. You love the cello, so focus on that. A lot can happen in a year. Do you have a private teacher? Have you considered a summer program? Would you help teach kids or play for seniors, that kind of thing? Only if you enjoy it.</p>

<p>Colleges want a well-rounded campus and class. That includes some “well rounded” students but every individual contributes to the mix. Your cello is something you can contribute on campus.</p>

<p>If you like science, look into opportunities to expand that interest too, though you are not obligated to if your cello and school work are keeping you busy.</p>

<p>You sound like a grounded sensible person. Be yourself, do what you love, and you will end up in the right place for college. Don’t get fixated on any particular schools, apply to a range, and reach high for some. Personally, I think Tufts would be great for you.</p>

<p>Don’t worry too much about those grades either. </p>

<p>You have another year or so before you have to get serious about college. Enjoy your cello in the meantime. I know you are working hard: it sounds like you are quite serious about it. Any college will appreciate your work ethic and focus.</p>

<p>@compmom‌ </p>

<p>Thanks for replying! :slight_smile: Yeah, Tufts is also on my list…just looking at colleges with good music and science programs right now. Yes, I do have a private teacher who I have studied w/ for about 4 years now (1st year of cello I didn’t do much haha) and I did not know summer music camps exist. I guess I’ll apply next year then. </p>

<p>This forum is a great place to get info on them :)</p>

<p>Some advice from a parent and parent/advocate who has seen many a teen go through this process. Forget trying to game the system. Instead focus on yourself and what you want to do with your time and what you want to learn. If you honestly love music and find that AP classes are taking too much time away from your practice time then don’t take the AP classes. If you love science and math and want to pursue that then look for ways to explore areas that are of particular interest. Contact faculty, look for summer opportunities that might expose you to things you can see yourself doing as an adult. But PLEASE do not join “French or German club” (just an example) to pad that resume. And please do not try to overanalyze the admissions process all because you believe that Columbia is your dream school. </p>

<p>There is the long-game and the short-game in this process. The short-game focuses on getting admitted to a prestigious school whose name has brand-appeal. The long-game is figuring out who you are as a person and what you want to do with your life and how you want to spend your time. The two are not incompatible. In my experience the kids who do best are the kids who do the later. College admissions offices do pick up on kids who are honest and have not “played the game”. But not always. But there is a lot to be said for not arriving at college burnt out after being overly stressed from working ridiculously hard in HS just to impress an admissions officer who will spend at most 3-5 minutes with your application. </p>

<p>So enjoy your time as a teenager. Make time to laugh with friends. Play Cello as much as you want to play. Make time to read and learn what you want to learn. Do your school work, but try not to get caught up in the insanity. Don’t waste time doing excessive prep for an SAT. Your time practicing Cello will be healthier and do more for your brain development then any SAT prep will. </p>

<p>And remember the world is a big place. There are many ways to get to where you want to go in life besides focusing on admission to one particular college or program.</p>

<p>Great post StacJip!</p>

<p>@StacJip‌ </p>

<p>Thank you for the advice :smiley: !</p>