Physics Regents

<p>I need an 88 to get into AP Physics C. Any studying advice or tips? Need that 88 or above!!</p>

<p>I, too, would like some tips, I'm terrified of this Regents.</p>

<p>I'm sorry, what an unhelpful response! More like a mooching response, I need advice too.. :p</p>

<p>I think Physics is the only science Regents I haven't/willn't take. However, the rule of thumb for science Regents are all the same: KNOW THE REFERENCE TABLE INSIDE AND OUT!</p>

<p>It's okay, it is the most difficult regents to obtain mastery level. Does anyone want to post questions and try to answer the problems. Kind of like a regents review?</p>

<p>it was hard :[ i hate physics</p>

<p>That was a joke. Way easier than previous exams.</p>

<p>was it really necessary to rub it in?</p>

<p>not everyone is a physics whiz you know. i wish jmap would just put up the answers so i can check if i failed. i just want to pass now...lol.</p>

<p>LOL I know. It WAS hard >.< but hopefully I near 88 scores, they still might place me in AP if I got an 86 or so. </p>

<p>Does anyone know the answers for sure?</p>

<p>What did you guys think was hard?</p>

<p>Freaking Find net force, and acceleration on that object. I didn't know what the net force was and how to find acc. bc v and t weren't given. </p>

<p>Also, what was the energy level for lowest emission? </p>

<p>Also, how to find the frictional force for the sled? What coefficient of friction do you use because it's not given but I used ski on ice or whatever.. >.<</p>

<p>There was an 8N force pulling on it and 6N force of friction so net was 2N. Fnet = ma . m=2.04kg a=.98m/s2</p>

<p>Energy level was 3.</p>

<p>Frictional force of the sled was equal to the magnitude of the horizontal component because it was moving at constant speed. Fnet = 0</p>

<p>Coefficient was wood on wood for kinetic. 0.30</p>

<p>also for the spring one, i messed it up and had to whiteout.
was it 0.19 J and then the max height was like 0.98 m or something? i reallly hope so...</p>

<p>3.33 x 10^-19 J right and then 2.08 ev?</p>

<p>also was the best-fit line didn't touch any points except the last one right?</p>

<p>Yeah you're correct.</p>

<p>omg...im so happy. wait was the resistors one, total resistance like 2.8? and ammeter 1 was current like 3 A? And the missing resistor value was like 10?</p>

<p>Total was 2.4, Current was 4A, missing resistor was 12.</p>

<p>Couldn't we do a best-fit curve? I did because it was changing at a specific rate. I don't think the test specifically requested a straight line.</p>

<p>ok now im sad again
my teacher said to always do best-fit lines.</p>

<p>I got exactly what diginetgod got.</p>

<p>check jmap later...they might put physics mc on</p>

<p>yunu- you got a line or curve? i did line..? its only worth 1 pt anyways</p>

<p>Its a curve. It said draw best fit line or curve</p>

<p>Besides, the graph was obviously hyperbolic, look at the equation. wavelength x frequency = constant.</p>

<p>is a line ok too? :/</p>

<p>some mcs i remember:
for prob 2, 2.2 m/s
increases (concurrent forces)
resonance (glove vibrate)
lower pitch
electric charge
sound (needs medium)
0.2 m (what opening is most diffraction)</p>