<p>kinkbike23, I think I know what you're thinking (correct me if i'm wrong): seeing that WashU is a higher ranked school (according to US News' arbitrary ranking methodology), you are debating whether or not the added tuition and living in the Midwest for 4 years is worth it because you believe that it may up your odds of getting into medical school....</p>
<p>It's not. Med admissions people generally don't give a damn where you go to school, but WHAT YOU ACCOMPLISH while you're in school. I know a kid at Stanford with good grades, a 42 on the MCAT (that is 99.9+ percentile; it is absolutely phenomenal and considered much more impressive than scoring a perfect 2400 on the SATs), and decent extra-curriculars that got REJECTED from EVERY SINGLE California medical school that he applied to. Then I also know a kid who graduated from Cal State Fresno (those who are familiar with California schools will know that CSU-Fresno is pretty much a 4-year junior college) who scored much lower on the MCAT, decent grades (albeit at CSU Fresno), but got accepted to USC, UCLA, and UCSF medical schools (and he no-doubt would have gotten into many other awesome schools but he withdrew all his other apps after he got his first California acceptance from USC)....and he wasn't an under-represented minority either- he was white. </p>
<p>The difference between the two applicants is that although the Stanford kid was obviously very very very bright and had jumped through all the pre-med "hoops" such as volunteering, shadowing docs, "doing research" (ie, helping out in a lab), joining clubs, among others (and he did get into a couple great medical schools), his application wasn't as impressive as the Cal State guy's because of what the Cal State guy accomplished OUTSIDE OF SCHOOL: he had a high-up leadership position in a national medical-related organization, did missionary/volunteer work overseas, in addition to getting published doing medical research at a nearby hospital.....</p>
<p>The admissions people at reputable medical schools don't really care if you "talk the talk", but whether you "walk the walk". </p>
<p>My advice to you is choose an undergraduate institution based on 1) Cost and 2) Environment, and NOTHING else should matter. Once upon a time, I had a difficult time deciding between a Berkeley education and an Ivy League education, and if I had to do it all over again, the dilemna would not even exist because I would not have bothered to apply to private schools for an undergraduate education. </p>
<p>If you go to Berkeley, protect your GPA by taking only 2 sciences courses max per semester, and more than anything, GET INVOLVED. A meaningful leadership position, dedicated volunteerism/activism, a published medical research that you played a significant role in carries MUCH more weight than a high MCAT score (ever wonder why Havard med's MCAT average is only slightly higher than UC Irvine's?). Also, choose a major based on difficulty as well as interest (ie, choosing a masochistic major will not win you points): generally, a 3.75 GPA in Chemistry at Berkeley doesn't carry as much weight as a 3.9 GPA in Psychology at UC Davis. Not fair? That's just how it is. If you have any questions, just PM me.</p>
<p>I hope all this helped!!</p>