<p>Reading your original post, Scripps stood out to me as the best fit. It was their interdisciplinary approach (Core is the obvious example) that really caught my eye. Scripps' strengths tend to be seen as literature, languages, and arts (the most popular majors are Studio Art, Psych, Politics, English, and Bio). That said, all three of the schools are certainly viable fits (and I am biased ;)).</p>
<p>I would say that the single most important thing to do before shortening this list is to VISIT Claremont. If you can't visit and if all three schools do sound appealing to your daughter, then I'd really encourage her to apply to all three. They're vastly different, but all wonderful, and the last thing you'll want is for her to just choose to apply to two, visit them, and find that she loves the third. There's so much you can't get from guidebooks. It's one thing when a "would've-could've-should've" school is out of sight and out of mind, but it's another when you have a set-up like Claremont and you could potentially wind up having that school right next door. Inter-Claremont transfers do happen, and often for this sort of reason.</p>
<p>If it really is important that the list gets cut down, I would personally suggest that your daughter cut CMC. Not because it isn't a great school, but because it seems the least in line (of the three) with the diversity of your daughter's interests, and even though it's the school that is most vocal about the importance of leadership, it's certainly not the only place in Claremont that welcomes leader "types." CMC also seems least in line with a few of your daughter's other school choices (particularly Reed and Chicago). Applying to Scripps/Pomona also maximizes the range of selectivity (although as someone who took multiple classes on every campus, I can absolutely say that I mean only "selectivity" and NOT necessarily "quality"), which might be a comfort. It also looks like your daughter could be a contender for merit aid at Scripps, although I don't know enough to say that too confidently. That said, I agree with SpiritManager: you can't go too wrong at any of these three schools.</p>
<p>But once again...almost everything at Claremont is shared. No amount of brochure-browsing will do justice to the real amount of overlap. As long as you're sure of the important things--availability of major (or possibility of cross-majoring...rules vary by campus), differences in GEs, etc. (Ex: Mudd, no matter how wonderful of an environment, would simply not be a good choice for a non-science/math/engineering student because she'd be required to have a technical degree--either major or minor--and she'd be stuck with all of the tech-related GEs)--then the most important thing is fit. </p>
<p>SpiritManager's post (#6) was an excellent one, although I'd still encourage your daughter to pay close attention to the "fluffier" aspects of the schools. Not just GE's (although they're top of the list), but also dorms, the physical campus, the "feel" she gets from students and administration, and so forth. Because of my degrees, neither of which I declared as a freshman, I took many of my courses off-campus (less than half, but just barely). My home campus was still my very favorite place to take courses, though, and it was definitely the right place for me to live and socialize. I know engineers at Scripps, physicists at Pitzer, and artists at CMC who feel the same way. That's my only caution against the course catalog method, although it's still a great first step!</p>