<p>Just extrapolating from currently rising trends in the Freshman Admission Profile... :rolleyes:</p>
<p>Weighted GPA: ~4.33
Unweighted GPA: ~3.83
UC GPA: ~4.13
SAT I: ~2015
SAT II: ~730, ~685</p>
<p>What is the different between Weighted GPA and UC GPA?</p>
<p>UC score may provide a better comparison.. just a thought
CaliforniaColleges.edu</a> - Scholarship Requirement</p>
<p>Taiwan: UC GPA is the GPA from Grades 10 and 11.</p>
<p>UC GPA is limited to 8 honors/AP points from 10th-11th grade. Unweighted, there is no limit and is for all 4 years.</p>
<p>Drop any + and - from grades when calculating UC GPA. </p>
<p>Only include recognized a-g types of classes. No PE, no religion, etc.</p>
<p>I say holistic admissions will skew the data and we'll probably have a more diverse socioeconomic make-up and that sort of thing... and a surge in AAP students. So really, UCLA's getting more applications. More kids are being qualified from "ELC" (not necessarily a trend in higher quality students either) and more people are applying. Says nothing about the quality of the students - maybe about the availability of applying to colleges though. So, how is UCLA going to serve the disadvantaged students...? It's not like Covel or Campbell are getting any bigger.</p>
<p>
I would say something about socio-economic castes and ethnic variations in student quality (measured by GPA/SAT scores) among UCLA applicants not from the Silicon Valley region, especially having to do with the peculiar number "96", but it wouldn't be "holistic", and downright controversial, see... <em>knocks on wood</em> :rolleyes:</p>
<p>i hope grades/scores will play less of a role as EC's will play a bigger role, thus seeing a final decrease in GPA compared to last year. however, we never know. that dang holistic system</p>
<p>^Go to bed and stop thinking about it!</p>