<p>No premarital sex in any circumstance at any point ever.</p>
<p>Easy policy to remember, easy policy to follow.</p>
<p>It’s really easy to apply. See:</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>No sex.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>People have been fine for centuries with no premarital sex. I don’t see this as a convincing line of reasoning at all.</p>
<p>Anyway, how’s this: If people are going to have premarital sex, I would infinitely rather they have unprotected sex than protected sex. I wonder how many people agree with me.</p>
<p>@True, I love how you just ignored a direct quote that contradicts you. Glad to know you read and understand all of the “Bible” and not just the parts that you wish to read and understand.</p>
<p>@Baelor- what if people don’t want to get married? People have also been having sex without marriage for hundreds of thousands of years, LONG before the whole concept of marriage came about.</p>
<p>Curseittoheaven, you are really gonna try that argument? Dude, if we have only one partner, we will get turned on and be as compatible as an orgasm can be.</p>
<p>I mean, the answer is right there. You don’t have to infer everything. Literally all relevant information is right there. Where is the ambiguity?</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>No duh. So clearly people can have successful marriages after egregious errors in judgment. That doesn’t change the fact that couples that do not have sex prior to marriage can work out sexual issues that may arise during the marriage.</p>
<p>Be nice Romani. I did not mean to ignore. I am trying to stay up with others on this forum. Btw, gotta get off. Good night, y’all. It’s been funeeee :)!!!</p>
<p>Would people stop using the Bible, the New Testament was written 100yrs AFTER the death of Jesus. And was translated 100 times before it came to Modern English, what makes you think it’s a good piece of hard evidence to back up your claim?</p>
<p>Like I said before, it’s up to the choice of the person not you. This whole thread is based on opinion and should, therefore, be treated that way.</p>
<p>Marriage doesn’t necessarily define a relationship. What if two people are fully committed to each other and they spend the rest of their lives together?</p>
<p>A scrap of paper doesn’t mean anything. But whatever, it’s fine if you want it to decide your own personal choices.</p>
<p>@Hahalolk, I have heard other stats and plenty of anecdotes that say otherwise but this is one of those things that is so incredibly subjective that it’s not worth arguing about and I do respect your opinion. And dancing has nothing to do with sexual prowess. Sex is something that takes TIME to get right. You have to practice A LOT in order for either partner to get something satisfying out of it. Especially for women.
Also, what is virginity???Everyone has a different answer for this question. Is a virgin someone who has just never had intercourse? Or does it involve more than that? What about gay and lesbian people? </p>
<p>And True Love, what exactly does that mean???Do you honestly think that I would ever hurt you? That’s awful! This is a conversation and I’m honestly wondering why you are so judgemental. WHy must EVERYONE live under your moral code?</p>
<p>@fairy_dreams exactly that’s why I don’t necessarily believe in marriage. It’s a document that says your together. From what I know love is stronger then anything in this world, and no law or paper can break that apart.</p>
<p>Toxic, I know the Bible is toxic and death to your selfish nature. But, don’t try your silly arguments to try to shut out Truth that is convicting your conscience. It is not gonna work, bud. Peace out</p>
<p>You may be right. I was offering a possibility based off of some study I had seen regarding evolution and why humans dance or something. I honestly wouldn’t know. Thank you for respecting my opinion.</p>
<p>@TrueLove whoa how are you insulting me? I never judged you, and now you judge me. I just basically defended you by saying we need to respect each others opinions. You truly aren’t a Christian, because you will respect others, this is a true shame on your part.</p>