<p>1) I don't know about soc in particular, but I would say that not majoring in bio will cause you to have more work just because the bio major includes many premed requirements. However, you should certainly have enough time to do another major + premed requirements, especially if you plan ahead and don't take too many random classes. Definitely chat with your advisor about this; I think you will be able to make it work :) There are many non-bio premeds. Med schools think it's interesting.</p>
<p>2) The two big points I want to make on this issue are...
--1-- Being at a top school automatically gives you a boost over students at state schools. 3.4 at Stanford may be worth similar to 3.9 elsewhere. I'm making those numbers up, but seriously, medical schools KNOW that competition is tougher at top schools and that courses are more difficult.</p>
<p>--2-- The quality of education is significantly different, from my experience. I took physics at a UC (which is really still 1st or 2nd tier) and found the pace slow, the tests exactly like the homework, and the students unengaged. Frankly, it was boring and not challenging. I still had to study, and I did learn, but I didn't have fun in that environment. In contrast, at Stanford, I love interacting with the people of varied backgrounds who are all passionate about something. While it's hard for me to do well in many classes, I love the challenge. I am pushed to learn and understand so much more because tests aren't just plug-and-chug; we're expected to go beyond the details and concepts and synthesize them to solve complex problems. So the question is - how much do you want to be challenged? And another question... what kind of learning environment do you want to be in?</p>
<p>So, I don't know if the curriculum is actually different in general, but I would say that Stanford will go more into detail and expect much more out of you. I find this method of learning much more rewarding than doing the same problems with different numbers. Unfortunately, I don't feel that I can speak about humanities classes at state schools versus Stanford.</p>
<p>Check out this thread <a href="http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=352871%5B/url%5D">http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=352871</a> to see more opinions. I'm silverlining1, in case you were wondering.</p>
<p>P.S. I feel bad for my state school bashing. I think there's many ways to have a successful, happy life. For me, that's through a challenging school like Stanford and on to medicine. Others find this level of education unnecessary, and I think that's definitely respectable. So yea... I think that, in general, students at state schools are less high achievers in education (which the numbers agree with), but I don't mean to imply that they're dull, stupid people. I didn't enjoy having discussion section with them because they rarely spoke up and didn't seem excited to learn, but they could be awesome in many other realms of life :)</p>