<p>Hi. I just completed my sophomore year. After taking one practice PSAT test, I received a score of 1920 (during Autumn of that year) on my real PSAT (660CR, 660M, 600W).</p>
<p>The writing score is weird because I got a 670 on the PSAT practice test.</p>
<p>I would like to study for the SAT I over the summer, but I don't know what books to get. I have the BlueBook (Official SAT Study Guide), and I'm not sure whether I should get the Barron's 2400 or the Princeton Review.</p>
<p>I like the Princeton Review's style with SAT Subject Tests, but I feel that the Barron's 2400 may be better as a specific companion book the BlueBook with which I can practice.</p>
<p>I'm a dedicated, motivated, and hardworking student (3.99 GPA), but I hate standardized tests. So, which BOOK should I get? Should I wait for a new edition that comes out in August or something? How should I use the books to study? THANKS in advance.</p>
<p>Get both. New edition doesnt matter; in fact there are little changes if any. If you must, get PR since the questions are similar to SAT caliber. Barrons tends to be a bit harder and the question types are not SAT-like IMO.</p>
<p>No offense, but I don't think the 2400 books are right for you. I think a normal one would be a better fit. The 2400 designation merely signifies that it is aimed for people who want more strategy and less content. Looking at your scores, it seems like you would do better with better understanding of content. Remember, the 2400 books don't give you a 2400, just allow someone with lets say around 2100 or higher the chance to.</p>
<p>I second that barrons aren't good books. Also I agree that you should read a normal prep book first, I recommend Grubers, it'll help you pull up all of the scores.</p>