I’m working on a much longer and more thorough post, but looking for a quick take on the colleges listed above.
For a kid with a declared interest in hard sciences, notably Physics, and a general preference for liberal/quirky LACs and small universities. Has so far visited and short-listed Rice & Wesleyan (high reaches, bordering on fantasy), Oberlin, Case & Brandeis (reaches), Muhlenberg & College of Wooster (hopefully likelies). There’s a notable absence of matches, though I frankly have a little trouble distinguishing between matches and low reaches. (More on that in another post.)
Also attracted to (but has not yet visited, in rough descending order of reachiness) Carleton, Reed, Macalester, University of Rochester, Stonybrook and Kalamazoo. Did not care for any of the larger schools we visited (which makes me wonder about Stonybrook, but it’s staying on the list.)
Because we live in NY, and interest is high, we will definitely visit Rochester and Stonybrook, and are considering a junket out to see Macalaster and Carleton, mostly because I think Macalaster would be a particularly good fit. For the others on the unvisited short list, we’ll have to settle for what we can learn online.
The question is, given what is suggested by preferences above, and given that the kid is a little burned out on visiting, should I make an effort to add Skidmore, Dickinson (both reasonable driving distance) and Bates (looking for an excuse to go to Maine, really) to the list of schools we visit in person, or is there no powerful reason to do so given the focus of the rest of the list. (And should we perhaps focus instead on second visits and personal interviews rather than spreading the net any further?)
Grateful for any thoughts, thanks.