<p>would you say PR's 11 tests are the most similar to the real SAT (second to the Blue Book)?</p>
<p>i thought that it was pretty bad, questionwise. Try the 10 practice tests by sparknotes. I prefer that one.</p>
<p>The PR tests are Crap. The questions are not in order of difficulty in any section, the questions are not of the same standard as those on the Blue book</p>
<p>I don't know why, but I tend to get a lot more wrong than I do in the real SAT.</p>
<p>anyways, I think PR's 11 is still a decent book</p>
<p>Exactly. From the Blue book I get about 5-6 wrong in CR but from PR I get a lot more wrong</p>
<p>isn't it better to practice with material thats tougher than the actual SAT rather than easier material?</p>
<p>badman89 is dead on right!!</p>
<p>Really? I thought the PR tests were totally on par.</p>
<p>not really. SAT is a matter of speed not how much extra crap you know. In math for instance, CB only tests on a certain spectrum of subjects. Studying a lot of other crap with PR is useless.</p>
<p>i used the CB book last year, crappy CR and Writing scores, great math scores, now i;m currently using the PR book and focusing on CR, and my scores just dun increase at all... How to improve CR man????</p>