<p>@mabs</p>
<p>Was it the Bach one and followed by the Swallows one?</p>
<p>its one cuz there think of it like this: <></p>
<p>I did not have 2 no errors in a row. I had 2 total.</p>
<p>I was pretty sure about all the ones I chose an error for. (Except the Washington D.C. one)</p>
<p>Were there any you were unsure about?</p>
<p>Which one was the swallows one? Do you remember the sentence? I for sure chose an error for that one.</p>
<p>I dont remember exactly but I think I chose 4-5 No Errors (one of these is wrong - the scientists one)</p>
<p>o-o you people are seriously freaking me out.
i’ve got to stay away from this thread so i dont pull all my hair out before december lol</p>
<p>Welcome to CC :)</p>
<p>im pretty sure it was articulate. cuz it said he didnt talk to others</p>
<p>I agree with articulate</p>
<p>Yup, it was articulate</p>
<p>do u guys think -1 for CR will be 80 still?</p>
<p>^I would think so.</p>
<p>which question had to do with articulate? Can someone freshen my memory?</p>
<p>which would Hari’s boss not be?</p>
<p>anyways, so u think this CR was harder than last year’s?
I think -1 last year was 79</p>
<p>Which of these is Jagu not?</p>
<p>Ya, it will prbly be an 80 or 79-78. Not too low, since it’s c.r. and not math.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the 19th problem on section 2 (math) or the 17th problem on section 4 (math)</p>
<p>and i think the answer to the swallows one was “explanation for” not “explanation of” The researches wanted to know “why” the swallows were coming every year. Not “in what manner” they came. Therefore they wanted an explanation for the behavior, not an explanation of the behavior. Do you agree?</p>
<p>Dang, I missed that one because I missread the question. :(</p>
<p>Ok…even if you only miss one problem you can’t get an 80 on cr? Wow, that’s unfortunate:/</p>
<p>it depends on the curve</p>
<p>^^ angel15 - 19th problem on section 2 math was something about numbers w/o 7 under 1000 (answer was 728).</p>